We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (17,774)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (207)
  • Negative Media (139)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (656)
  • Wink's Articles (265)
  • Wink's Inside Story (238)
  • Wink's Press Releases (99)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Maryland ‘death master file’ law for life insurers upheld

    September 8, 2016 by IFAWebnews Staff

    A Maryland state court has ruled that a Maryland insurance law requiring insurance companies to check the latest version of a death master file, or DMF, is applicable to in-force policies issued before the law became effective in 2013.

    Insurers United Insurance Company of America and Reliable Life Insurance sued the Maryland Insurance Administration, arguing that the law could not be applied to policies issued before the law’s Oct. 1, 2013 effective date.

    The Maryland Court of Special Appeals, the second-highest court in the state, disagreed and said the insurance companies had delivered a “strained reading” of the statute.

    “We are not persuaded, and hold that the constitutional exception is inapplicable,” as the insurers don’t challenge the constitutionality of the law but instead the constitutionality of retroactive enforcement to in-force policies, wrote Judge Michele D. Hotten, in a 37-page opinion.

    Click here to read the decision.

    As of December 2011, the two insurers had about 135,000 policies on the books to lower-income policyholders. The policies had relatively small face values, averaging about $5,000 each, and with policyholders paying average monthly premiums of $7.

    Not only would the 2013 law applied retroactively affect the economic assumptions upon which premiums were based, the law was also a violation of the Maryland Declaration of Rights and the U.S. Constitution, the insurers argued.

    Under Section 16-118 of the Maryland code, it is the duty of insurers to compare in-force life insurance policies and annuity contracts against the latest version of the Social Security Administration’s DMF.

    When Maryland insurance officials announced in early 2013 that they would enforce the law effective later that year, the insurance companies sued.

    The law was passed in response to the growing concern of questionable and unfair settlement practices by life insurance companies, which often led to beneficiaries receiving benefits years after the death of the policyholder, or sometimes not at all.

    Before the 2013 law, Maryland insurers were under no obligation to research whether a policyholder had died and over the past five years. Dozens of life insurers nationwide have settled with regulators over the use of the DMF.

    States accused insurance companies of not bothering to cross-reference the DMF when it came to life insurance benefit payouts, yet companies were more than happy to dig through the same data to stop annuity payments to deceased beneficiaries, regulators pointed out.

    Originally Posted at Insurance & Financial Advisor on September 8, 2016 by IFAWebnews Staff.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency