We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Annuities’ Future

    November 4, 2016 by Ben Mattlin

    Unless you’ve been living under a rock, you know the Department of Labor (DOL) issued new standards for retirement products last April. Included among the items subject to a higher fiduciary standard are variable annuities (VAs) and fixed-indexed annuities (FIAs). But what exactly that means isn’t entirely clear. Yet.

    Whether you believe the new regs will save the industry from unscrupulous practices or destroy it with unnecessary and overly complex rules, one fact appears indisputable: The industry and the products will have to adjust to fit the new regulations. As insurance companies scramble to redesign their annuities for this post-DOL world, how can advisors prepare themselves for what’s likely to be a complex transition?

    Multifaceted Pressure

    In late September, Nationwide acquired Jefferson National, a provider of low-fee variable annuities, and said the DOL Rule was the deal primary impetus for the deal. “There will be pressure to transform what annuities are, but annuities aren’t going to disappear,” says Larry Greenberg, president of Louisville, Ky.-based Jefferson National, in an interview shortly before the transaction was announced.

     

    That pressure, he says, is multifaceted. “There is intense regulatory scrutiny, a lot of public distrust of financial services companies in general, and a strong focus on educating consumers to think about the price of financial products, their value and costs,” Greenberg explains. These distinct but overlapping factors are generating a move toward products that “will be lower cost, represent stronger value and be more transparent.” 

    Lower Commissions

    To most observers, though, the new breed of products will probably also carry lower commissions—possibly even NO commissions—and favor more fee-based contracts. That’s because, under the new rules, VAs, FIAs and other equity-based products and services sold on commission will require a best interest contract exemption (BICE) for every client. That’s a legally binding guarantee of non-bias as well as full disclosure on all costs and fees.

    Several FIA providers have already announced plans to issue new fee-based products to get around the BICE regulation, and in late-september Jackson National Life Insurance Co. released its first fee-based VA. “I see commissions getting reduced, which is fine by me,” says Andrew Murdoch, president of Somerset Wealth Strategies, in Portland, Ore. As a result, he says, “insurance carriers’ sales will be down, some advisors will be forced to leave the business as they will not survive, and clients will lose advisors that do not make it or are newer to the business.”

    Murdoch is in the camp that thinks these reforms are for the good. To be clear, though, he isn’t sounding the death knell of annuities. “They will always have a place in a portfolio,” he says, “but [the DOL ruling] will eliminate some people’s overselling the benefits, which is a problem now.”

    Eliminating Bad Actors

    Eliminating the bad actors—those who make false promises to clients or issue recommendations solely based on the commissions they receive—will of course be good for the industry. And after all, that’s partly the point of the new regulatory scrutiny. Yet the repercussions of these changes could catch many well-intentioned and scrupulous advisors by surprise. 

    One recent FUSE Research Network survey found that two-thirds of advisors don’t believe the new regs will have any impact—either positive or negative—on the use of VAs. A few even believe the rules will lead to greater use of the products. “[Those] advisors will be surprised, unless they do not use annuities,” says Murdoch.

    Duane Thompson, a senior policy analyst at Pittsburgh-headquartered fi360, a fiduciary training firm and the credentialing body for the Accredited Investment Fiduciary and the Accredited Investment Fiduciary Analyst designations, puts it this way: “They are in an unfortunate state of denial.”

    Thompson adds, however, that many others are on the opposite end of the spectrum. There’s “a tremendous amount of uncertainty and concern from firms that rely heavily on commission and third-party revenue. They—and all of us—are anxiously awaiting additional regulatory guidance promised by the DOL,” he says.

    Echoing others, Thompson anticipates a “significant transformation from a sales-oriented business model to a client-centric fiduciary culture.” He says this transformation could take years to accomplish. But he, too, believes that equity-linked annuities will continue in some shape or form, as retiring baby boomers seek sources of income that can appreciate over time. 

    Lack Of Clarity

    Part of the frustration lies in the fact that, under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA), it’s not certain what kind or degree of advisor compensation is considered “reasonable.” “It’s likely commissions will get slashed, but we won’t have the answer on how much for perhaps years,” says Thompson. Clearer definitions may only emerge after lawsuits and enforcement actions, but the end result, he says, will probably be “more streamlined and fiduciary-friendly annuity products without the bells-and-whistles add-ons that make these products complex.”

    In the meantime, Thompson’s advice to advisors is: “Don’t be resistant to change, whether you’re commission-based or fee-only.” He adds that paying attention to academic research on the role of annuity products in a retirement portfolio would be a good way for some advisors to bone up on their fiduciary responsibilities. Many academics tend to like annuities as a source of retirement income due to their predictability.

    Putting Annuities in Context

     

    To Greenberg at Jefferson National, this transition is just the latest step in a broad-based movement that’s been going on for decades. “Even the big wirehouses have moved their businesses to a fee-based model where they’re managing money for clients in fee-based accounts,” he says. “Insurance products are the last bastion of commissions, and now that’s starting to change.” 

    Taking the long view, the annuities markets should be able to work out the kinks over time. But it may get worse before it gets better. “The annuity industry will go through a couple of transition years after the full implementation of DOL, but I predict sales will ultimately increase because carriers will have to focus on simplicity and transparency, which means that consumers will better understand their choices and subsequently buy more,” says Stan “The Annuity Man” Haithcock, in Ponte Vedra Beach, Fla.

    He doesn’t think that will take too long. “The financial advisory industry always adapts quickly, regardless of what is thrown at them,” he says. 

    He further points out that the word “annuities” applies to many different types of products, which may contribute to the confusion. When viewed more as a type of insurance contract than an investment vehicle, the practical benefits become more obvious. 

    “The demographic tidal wave of baby boomers and retirees wanting contractual guarantees will still continue,” says Haithcock, citing income annuities, deferred annuities and qualified longevity annuity contracts (QLACs) among the products that “will always fill a need.” Most of these already offer a “pro-client design,” he says. 

    On the other hand, many FIAs and VAs will have to be redesigned to get away from their current sales models, many of which are “based on how much the agent army can sell,” says Haithcock. These are the products that “will see the most drastic product-design changes, which is a good thing,” he says.

    When the dust settles, Haithcock predicts “advisors will use more of these transfer-of-risk contractual strategies for the non-correlated part of a portfolio.” 

    The Aftermath

    Not everyone is so sure. “Right now, fee-only advisors don’t have a financial incentive to recommend annuities to clients who may need them,” says Michael Guillemette, assistant professor of personal financial planning at the University of Missouri. “In some circumstances, an annuity with a fee, but no commission, may help clients who are in the decumulation phase—as well as help annuity companies sell more product.”

    But the post-DOL world could also help secure annuities’ place in retirement planning. “We expect guaranteed lifetime income products to become more mainstream,” says Will Fuller, president, Annuity Solutions, Lincoln Financial Distributors and Lincoln Financial Network. “As advisors move clients from accumulation to distribution, it is critical they recognize the need for guaranteed lifetime income that can never go down and that you can’t outlive.”

    The guarantees inherent in these annuity contracts are even more crucial today as people live longer and traditional pensions can no longer be counted on. “The objective of qualified plans is to ultimately provide retirement income,” notes Fuller. “Given this great need, how can a solution that guarantees lifetime income—that an annuity provides—not be in the best interest of today’s clients?”

    Lincoln isn’t scrapping commissions altogether, however. “We believe in choice,” he says. “If a client has an income need and the solution that best fits their need is an annuity, we will be prepared to offer commission- and fee-based options.”

    One clear casualty of regulatory scrutiny appears to be the L share. For higher fees and an ongoing trailing commission, L shares offer a shorter surrender period than traditional B share annuities—there’s a period of four or five years before they can be sold, as opposed to a B-share annuity’s typical seven-year wait. Last August, both Jackson National Life Insurance Co. and Pruco Life Insurance Co., an annuity unit of Prudential Financial, announced they were ending sales of L-share VAs.

    “Those types of offerings are going to eventually disappear,” says Haithcock. He doesn’t mind, noting that those who truly have their clients’ best interests at heart won’t miss the L shares either.

    But don’t expect Lincoln to make such an announcement anytime soon. “If the market continues to see the need for this type of solution, we will continue to manufacture and distribute them,” says Fuller.

    Savvy advisors had better stay tuned.

    Originally Posted at Financial Advisor on November 1, 2016 by Ben Mattlin.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency