We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • ERISA consultants expect Trump to delay fiduciary rule

    January 23, 2017 by Nick Thornton

    High-placed industry consultants and administrative law experts are expecting a formal delay of the Labor Department’s fiduciary rule to be announced this week, as President Trump sets about issuing executive orders to roll back the regulatory initiatives of the Obama administration.

    Last Friday, hours after Trump was sworn into office, Reince Priebus, White House Chief of Staff, sent a memorandum instructing agency heads to freeze regulations yet to be published in the Federal Register and to delay the effective date of regulations already published in the register for 60 days.

    But applying the White House memo to the fiduciary rule “may be a stretch,” said Erin Sweeney, an Employee Retirement Income Security Act attorney with Miller & Chevalier in Washington, who is balancing how to advise her clients with the “widespread and persistent rumors” in Washington, D.C. as to what the Trump administration will do with the rule.

    The audacity of Labor’s Perez and Borzi in championing a fiduciary rule leaves a legacy, but whether it will be…

    The fiduciary rule was published in the Federal Register in April of 2016, and it has a June 8, 2016 effective date. In the eyes of the law, the meaning of “effective” date is different from the meaning of the implementation or applicability date of a rule, which in the case of the fiduciary rule is April 10.

    “The rule is effective, even though the compliance date is still out there, and that means the rule is in effect—it is the law,” said Leland Beck, an administrative law expert who previously worked in the Department of Homeland Security and Justice Department.

    If Friday’s White House memo is interpreted as a directive to delay implementation of the fiduciary rule, there is the possibility that it could be subject to a legal challenge under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act’s private right of action clause.

    Beck says that potential development would be without precedent. “I don’t know of any cases where a compliance date was delayed, and then a private actor sued. That underscores the uniqueness of the situation with the fiduciary rule. The law does not answer all of these questions.”

    Other options in the hopper

    Jason Roberts, CEO of the Pension Resource Institute and the founding attorney of the Retirement Law Group, has heard–but has been unable to verify– the Trump administration is also planning to send a separate document from Friday’s memo, directing the Labor Department to review the fiduciary rule.

    Roberts’ sources have also said Trump’s Labor Department will use existing legal precedent to delay the rule for six months until ongoing litigation over the rule is resolved in federal courts in Texas, Kansas, and Washington D.C.

    A separate proposal to delay the rule for one year will be issued by Labor, according to Roberts’ sources, which will be subject to a 14-day notice and comment period.

    And on top of those efforts, Labor’s new leadership is expected to separately propose to withdraw the rule, which would also be subject to a notice and comment period, for the purpose of replacing the rule.

    Roberts says the first two options to delay the rule could come any day, and that he believes his sources to be credible.

    If reports of the multi-pronged approach to delaying and possibly amending the rule are true, it would certainly put to rest speculation the Trump administration feels ambivalence for a rule that is expected to impact trillions of dollars in retirement savings in the coming years.

    Rather, if true, the strategy would suggest a delay is imminent and will come soon, and that any rule implemented under the Trump administration could look substantially different from the one industry has invested tens of millions to comply with.

    All-agency memo needs further clarification

    Barbara Roper, director of investor protection at the Consumer Federation of America, which advocated for the rule in its current form, says the legal team at CFA does not believe Friday’s agency-wide memo covers the fiduciary rule, given that its effective date has passed.

    “At the very least, I think firms weighing what to do about compliance would want clarification on that point,” said Roper in an email.

    “If the Trump administration were to try to delay the rule through the regulatory process without going through the appropriate, legally required notice and comment, we and others would have to seriously consider filing a legal challenge,” she added.

    The decision to move forward with a challenge won’t be made until the new administration fully reveals its course of action, said Roper. “It is essential that government agencies follow the same rigorous procedures when they seek to roll back regulations that industry demands when they seek to strengthen regulatory protections.”

    Erin Sweeney, who served as an attorney in the Employee Benefits Security Administration under the George W. Bush administration, said there is a precedent for delaying rules until existing legal challenges run their course.

    But Leland Beck suggested in the case of the fiduciary rule that strategy may also be subject to dispute.

    “There is a provision in the Administrative Procedure Act that says an agency can stay the effective date of a rule in the interest of justice if there is pending litigation,” said Beck. “But does this apply to the implementation date of a rule? Again, that is unclear.”

    Trump administration must weigh regulatory technicalities

    The fact that the fiduciary rule’s implementation date is different from its effective date raises technical regulatory questions.

    “There is no simple answer to whether to Trump administration can halt the fiduciary rule or any other rule that is already published,” said Beck. “If the effective date has passed, the rule can only be changed by another rule.”

    Because the fiduciary rule’s compliance date applies to private legal actions to enforce the rule, Beck says the Trump administration’s ability to change the compliance date will depend on language in the Code of Federal Regulations, the official codification of regulations published by the Federal Register.

    If the compliance date is already published in the CFR, then changing the date will require another rule.

    But if it has yet to be officially published in the CFR, then the Trump administration may have more latitude to delay the implementation date. Beck said the distinction “is not clear.”

    Originally Posted at BenefitsPro on January 23, 2017 by Nick Thornton.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency