We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Fiduciary rule is ‘difficult to kill’

    February 10, 2017 by Andrew Welsch

    The fiduciary rule is proving to be one tough survivor — for now.

    So far, three lawsuits seeking to undo the rule have been rejected. Those come after years of lobbying by some of the industry’s largest trade groups as well as fierce opposition from Republicans in Congress.

    “The Obama administration did some extremely smart things to protect the rule, one of which was to establish an effective date in the middle of last year,” says Blaine Aikin, executive chairman of fi360.

    “That makes it much more difficult to kill,” says Aikin, who was speaking at IMCA’s annual New York conference.

    Aikin also notes that Obama also had the backing of consumer groups, such as AARP. Moreover, several professional organizations of financial planners, such as the CFP Board, FPA and NAPFA, also backed the rule.

    Certainly, the fate of the Department of Labor regulation is still uncertain – President Trump could still find a way to undo it.

    But Trump’s memo issued last week didn’t actually delay the implementation date. It only instructed the Department of Labor to review the rule and laid down a framework for a potential repeal.

    Aikin said he wasn’t sure the rule could be undone prior to its implementation date of April 10. It took the Labor Department six years to craft and promulgate its fiduciary standard.

    “Only one thing is certain, and that this is the rule on the books today,” he says. “That tells me that some version of this rule will survive in some way. And I think as a practical matter, there is no turning back.”

    IN TRUMP’S HANDS
    The most recent court decision in favor of the rule, issued this week, firmly puts the burden on the president to decide the rule’s fate.

    “Given that none of the litigation attempts have succeeded and no other decisions are on the horizon, it has forced the hand of the administration to decide whether it wants to” immediately delay the rule’s applicability date, says Jean-David Larson, director of regulatory and strategic initiatives at Russell Investments.

    Larson says in an email that fiduciary proponents won’t “go quietly into the night” if the department moves to delay.

    “This, along with some other policy and regulatory issues, will be highly partisan,” he says.

    Ron Rhoades, professor and program director of the Financial Planning Program at Western Kentucky University, says that the court rulings defending the regulation will have long term implications.

    “Even if the DoL later decides to delay, and then eventually rescind, the fiduciary rule, the court decision will remain as clear authority that the adoption of the fiduciary rule was clearly within the DoL’s authority and was reasonable. As soon as the political climate shifts again, I would anticipate relatively quick adoption of the fiduciary rule all over again,” he says in an email.

    Skip Schweiss, managing director of corporate services at TD Ameritrade and also in attendance at the conference, says there has also been a “tsunami of consumer press” coverage of the rule.

    “That means that a lot of your clients are reading these things and maybe asking you advisers about it,” Schweiss told attendees.

    That raises the political stakes of substantially altering or overturning the rule.

    Larson points to additional ramifications from the fact that many firms have spent the past year preparing for implementation.

    “Some of the technical and behavioral changes the DoL rule was attempting to bring to light and change are already making their way through the market. In that sense, even if delayed, it will have achieved some of the prior administration’s objectives,” he says.

     

     

    Andrew Welsch is senior editor of On Wall Street.

    Originally Posted at Financial Planning on February 10, 2017 by Andrew Welsch.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency