We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,244)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (422)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (804)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Insurers uncertain about impact of Trump directive on fiduciary rule

    February 17, 2017 by Antonita Madonna

    NEW YORK (Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence) – U.S. President Donald Trump’s memorandum to the Department of Labor to review its “fiduciary rule” without ordering an explicit delay to its compliance deadline of April 10, has fueled uncertainty over its impact on an insurance industry that has already begun to prepare for compliance with the regulation against conflicts of interest in the handling of retirement investment.

    While the compliance deadline remains, the Labor Department has said it will consider legal options to delay the applicability date as it prepares to review the rule as directed by Trump’s memo issued on Friday, February 3. However, there is no clear word yet on a definite delay or not.

    The American Council of Life Insurers (ACLI), an association of life insurance companies and a strong opponent of the rule in its current form, said it was “pleased” with the announcement calling for the review but added a delay was also needed soon.

    “It is urgent the Department of Labor grant a delay in the application of the regulation, given the significant and harmful impact of the regulation on the ability of Americans to save for a financially secure retirement,” ACLI’s Chief Executive Dirk Kempthorne told Thomson Reuters in a statement via email.

    The proposed rule elevates all insurance agents providing investment advice on retirement products to the level of a ‘fiduciary’ and requires them to put the best interests of their clients first. The rule, designed to protect consumers from investment advice motivated by higher commissions on certain products, has been opposed on grounds of broker concerns over fees and a potentially reduced access to advice for lower- and middle-income investors.

    The life insurance industry has not been supportive of the rule, citing potentially lower sales and high costs of compliance that could drive smaller players out of business.

    Early on Friday, a draft of the memo showed Trump planned to formally delay enforcement of the rule by 180 days, and the financial services industry began to cheer reports. The final memo made public later in the day made no mention of a delay and the industry has been left with more questions over the fate of the rule.

    An industry official said the conflicting reports had led to discussions over what the final memo actually meant for the industry as it did not signal any immediate change for insurers.

    However, the overall directive to review the impact of the rule on investors, retirees, litigation and overall costs has been welcomed by the financial services industry.
    “We applaud the president’s leadership in calling for the DOL to put the rule on hold to give policymakers time to reevaluate the rule in order to protect consumers from these negative consequences,” said Cathy Weatherford, chief executive officer at Insured Retirement Institute – an association for the retirement income industry.

    She added the association continued to have significant concerns about the rule and its “sweeping changes” to the existing regulatory framework that will make it harder for savers to plan for retirement by “depriving them of access to affordable holistic financial advice and a wide range of investment options.”

    The Financial Services Institute, an organization of independent financial advisors and independent financial services firms, said it was ready to work with the president and his administration on a new standard that protects investors, as the current fiduciary rules out for access to “critical retirement advice” for many.

    “At a time when so few Americans are adequately saving for retirement, our elected officials should be doing everything possible to provide more incentives to save, not making it harder,” Chief Executive Dale Brown said.

    (Antonita Madonna is a correspondent for Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence, based in New York.)

    (This article was produced by Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence and initially posted on Feb. 7. Regulatory Intelligence provides a single source for regulatory news, analysis, rules and developments, with global coverage of more than 400 regulators and exchanges. Follow Regulatory Intelligence compliance news on Twitter: @thomsonreuters)

    Originally Posted at Reuters on February 16, 2017 by Antonita Madonna.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency