We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (17,774)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (207)
  • Negative Media (139)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (656)
  • Wink's Articles (265)
  • Wink's Inside Story (238)
  • Wink's Press Releases (99)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • 5 New Things to Know About Living Too Long

    April 11, 2017 by Allison Bell

    Click HERE to view the original story at ThinkAdvisor; free registration

    Living longer than expected can throw off your clients’ financial projections.

    Unexpected increases in annuity holder longevity can also throw off the annuity issuers’ own financial projections.

    The Life Risk-Based Capital Working Group, part of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, is thinking about ways to include longevity risk in annuity issuers’ risk-based capital ratios.

    An RBC ratio is a number that’s supposed to show how much financial power an insurer might have to meet its obligations during a period of extreme stress. In the past, regulators have tended to focus on trying to predict how the insurer assets parked in various types of investments might perform in a financial crisis. Regulators have dinged insurers for putting too much of the portfolio in shares of common stock, or too much in bonds issued by companies with low credit ratings.

    These days, regulators are trying to analyze the effects of other types of risk, such as the impact of severe epidemics on life insurers, or the effects of successful life-extension pills on annuity issuers.

    The Life RBC Working Group heard a presentation on annuity holder longevity risk Saturday, in Denver, at the spring meeting of the NAIC.

    Tricia Matson, the chairperson of the Longevity Risk Task Force at the American Academy of Actuaries, and Heather Jerbi, assistant director of public policy at the academy, gave the presentation.

    Actuaries are people who have passed tests showing that they understand the math used to create and analyze insurance programs, pension programs and other programs that involve statistical analysis of risk.

    For an insurance agent or financial advisor, the presentation shows how thinking about longevity risk may shape the financial machinery inside annuities and other longevity-based insurance products in the future.

    Here are five highlights from the presentation, drawn from a copy of the presentation posted on the working group’s section of the NAIC website. 

    1. Annuity issuers should have enough reserves to handle ordinary lifespan increases.

    The actuaries who gave the presentation said regulators try to set reserve requirements high enough to make up for longevity-related risk at least 85% of the time.

    The RBC ratio is meant to help insurers, regulators and others understand the adequacy of an insurer’s reserves, not to make up for shortfalls in reserves, the actuaries said.

    2. Regulators want to know how well the issuers’ capital would hold up if typical lifespans permanently shot up.

    The actuaries said RBC factors typically cover “95th percentile events,” or severe events that might occur every 20 years.

    “Short-term volatility risk will have a small financial impact on longevity products,” the actuaries said.

    3. One problem actuaries have is a limited supply of modern lifespan increase data.

    To create the tables used in the presentation for the NAIC working group, the actuaries used population data for the period from 1900 through 1913 for the Social Security population.

    The Social Security population consists of all U.S. workers, and that population might be different from the kinds of higher-income, well-organized, conscientious people who make the effort to buy annuities or other insurance products.

    Another challenge is that the Social Security data set includes information for only a limited number of separate 20-year periods, and that hurts efforts to show what a “once in 20 years” event might look like, the actuaries said.

    4. The lifespan picture for typical people is different from the picture for people who are tough as nails.

    For typical Americans, the actuaries found, lifespan increased 0.91% over a 20-year period, during the period studied.

    For the very durable people at the 95th percentile in terms of lifespan, lifespan increased 1.41% over that same period.

    For ordinary people, the lifespan increase was much smaller for older people than for younger people. The median increase was 1.28% for ordinary people ages 35 to 64, for example, and just 0.46% for ordinary people ages 85 and older.

    For very durable people, the lifespan increase was somewhat smaller for older people, but only somewhat smaller. The lifespan increase for people at the 95th percentile was 1.83% for the 35-64 age group. The increase was 1.23% for people in the 95th percentile at ages 85 and older.

    In other words: For very durable people ages 85 and older, the average lifespan increase was about three times higher than it was for ordinary people ages 85 and older.

    5. Actuaries worry about extreme longevity events.

    The actuaries said one Longevity Risk Task Force concern is medical breakthroughs.

    The task force is thinking about starting by excluding the possible effects of medical breakthroughs in RBC calculations.

    There are differing ideas about how medical breakthroughs will affect mortality, the actuaries said.

    “Further discussion is needed to determine if potential effects should be included in RBC,” the actuaries said.

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor on April 11, 2017 by Allison Bell.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency