We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Advisers find hidden opportunities in the fiduciary rule

    June 29, 2017 by Kenneth Corbin

    Weeks after its implementation date, the fiduciary rule enjoys broad support among clients as well as advisers. What’s more, planners report they’re seeing a boost to the bottom line.

    That silver lining is a direct result of how firms responded to the regulation. Companies introduced new employee training programs, compensation structures, and technology systems among other initiatives, according to a new study by Boston-based research firm Aite Group.

    Among RIAs, 81% say that they favor either keeping the fiduciary rule as is, or preserving the rule in a modified form, indicating “that they see benefits to elevating the standards across the business,” writes Denise Valentine, the author of the report.

    Since RIAs are already subject to fiduciary requirements, the impact of the rule will generally be more modest for them than broker-dealers and other types of advisers, Valentine observes.

    “Meeting the higher requirement certainly takes greater effort, and this would elevate the competitive field in terms of performance and compliance costs,” Valentine says.

    But RIAs view the rule only slightly more favorably than other advisers that the Aite Group canvassed, and a decided majority favor keeping the rule on the books in some form. When asked how the Department of Labor should proceed as it reviews the regulation, only 24% of advisers said that the department should “kill it.” Half of respondents want to amend the rule, and 26% saying they would be happy to let it stand as is.

    Respondents were slightly more likely to characterize the fiduciary rule as an opportunity than a challenge.

    Those who take an optimistic view of the rule say that it has compelled them to take a valuable inventory of their client accounts with an eye toward “profitability evaluations.”

    Additionally, survey respondents say that the compliance exercise brought on by the regulation helped them boost the bottom line by “streamlining operations and re-evaluating legacy products.” Some firms have also been moved to adopt new technologies in response to the rule that have been a boon for advisers.

    “Financial advisers see market disruption and confusion as opportunity to engage new clients and offer new services to existing clients,” she writes.

    AN UNCERTAIN FUTURE
    Valentine acknowledges that the future of the rule is far from certain, citing a Trump administration that “loathes regulation” and has already called for a regulatory review. “It is highly likely the rule will be amended, and the rule could be rescinded,” she concludes.

    Nevertheless, even if the Labor Department scraps the regulation, it has made an impact that isn’t likely to disappear. Advisers polled by the Aite Group reported that clients with whom they had discussed the rule overwhelmingly favored it (49%) over the slim minority (6%) who viewed it negatively. More than one-third of respondents say that their clients had mixed reactions, and 6% say their clients were neutral about the regulation.

    In part, those views could stem from the efforts firms have taken to shield their clients from the impact of the rule. Approximately three-quarters of respondents say that their firms have avoided raising fees in response to the fiduciary rule, a finding Valentine calls “eye-popping.”

    “This appears contrary to heavy media coverage that says clients would experience dramatic increases in product costs,” Valentine says.

    But perhaps more fundamentally, the heated and protracted debate over the rule has introduced the concept of fiduciary duty into the popular consciousness, thereby raising consumers’ expectations that financial professionals will offer advice that’s in the best interest of their clients.

    “Even if one expects the rule to be overturned, the topic is now mainstream and likely to produce client inquiries regardless of the final DoL decision,” Valentine writes.

    Originally Posted at Financial Planning on June 26, 2017 by Kenneth Corbin.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency