We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • The youth-led rebellion brewing in financial planning: Opinion

    August 9, 2017 by Bob Veres

    I’m a bit horrified by what I hear from younger advisors today. They say they want to take the next step in their firm’s evolution. They say they want to bring financial planning to the blue ocean of younger, not-yet-wealthy individuals who were, ironically, the same type of people that their firm’s founder worked with in the early days. They want to implement robo advisor technology and change their company’s fee structure from the old AUM model to something that matches, with more precision, the fee charged for services.

    But that’s not what I’m horrified by. I’m horrified by what happens when they propose these ideas to their firm’s founding planner. Too often the answer is a variation of: You can make all those changes after I retire.

    I’ve actually challenged those senior planners: When will that be? The advisor will smile and say, I actually never plan to retire.

    When I started out in the early 1980s, advisors were leading a glorious revolution against a stodgy industry. Their first big innovation was the idea that you should only sell the investment products and insurance coverages that people actually needed, based on a new kind of analysis called a financial plan. This was a dramatic departure from the typical sale, which proceeded from: “How much money do you have?”

    Then, in the early 1990s, a small group began charging only fees for their services. Forward-thinking advisors moved beyond the venerable investment pyramid and began managing portfolios under the mathematical logic (borrowed from the pension consulting industry) of modern portfolio theory. Many advisors embraced the deeper client relationship called life planning. The professional advisors I grew up with were, for the most part, idealistic dynamos of change and innovation, who saw themselves as revolutionaries on behalf of their clients.

    Of course the brokerage industry responded to these innovations, but it was kind of lame. The wirehouses introduced canned financial plans and fee-based wrap accounts with an annual 3% all-in fee structure. Life planning was boldly met with advertisements that made it sound as if brokerage representatives had been hired to look after the personal goals of their customers, rather than respond to the orders barked over a squawk box.

    Today, the planning profession has simultaneously reached a time of rapid evolution and managerial stagnation.

    HOW WE’VE CHANGED
    Software is taking over many of the menial chores that once required hours, days or even weeks in the planning office, including automated online performance statements and rebalancing; automated downloading and reconciliation; online client intake forms; tools and self-discovery questionnaires to ready clients for the initial meeting; automated forms generators and electronic signatures for transferring assets and opening new accounts; custodial online tracking of check requests and money movement; single-sign-on for all your software; plus videoconferencing to save clients the trip to the office.

    Collaborative planning and a pleasant onboarding process that explores life goals first and portfolios later is transforming the client experience. For the first time too, ordinary consumers are asking advisors if they’re willing to act as a fiduciary, thanks to the debate over the DoL rule.

    While the older advisors who used to drive change are recoiling from all these potentially beneficial changes, a generation of younger advisors is chafing with collective impatience. They feel like they owe it to their generation to bring the many benefits of financial planning into their lives and they want to start their own prospecting process and build their own client base.

    Founding advisors — people who themselves worked with their unwealthy peers back in the day — are complaining that their successors are simply not working hard enough to bring in the aging decumulators who have become their firms’ sweet spot.

    Perhaps more importantly, the founding generation of advisors somehow allowed their revolutionary spirit to ebb away in the daily effort to maximize profits, generate new business and handle the day-to-day managerial chores associated with a real business.

    Financial planning is, at its core, an idealistic alternative to the brokerage industry’s founding idea that giving advice is about maximizing profits. But when you talk to many founding advisors today about what’s new in their business, you hear about performance metrics.

    THE NEXT REBELLION
    I’m going to predict that the financial planning profession is about to go through another revolution. Thousands of younger advisors, fed up with the restrictions at their sclerotic firms, more intent on changing the world than squeezing every last dollar out of their engagements, are going to go out on their own and harvest the next generation of clients long before they’ll reach the minimums set by many planning firms today.

    These younger firms will struggle at first, just like the founding generation of financial planners did. But with better utilization of technology, they’ll be more efficient than the larger firms, and more receptive to client needs—and they’ll offer their services at a better price point. 

    They will, in short, lead the profession’s second rebellion against the established status quo, just like the founders of the financial planning movement did, and the profession will once again evolve in ways that dramatically benefit both advisors and clients.

    The older advisors who don’t want to change will get their wish: they’ll work until they drop with an increasingly aging cohort of clients whose heirs will take their inheritances to the younger, vibrant firms that are already helping them achieve their goals.

    And I hope that after this next revolution has played itself out, we will have finally learned a lesson that many of my own generation somehow forgot: that dramatic change is not just necessary; it is inevitable and it is our small, still-growing profession’s ever-constant best friend in the competition with the larger brokerage industry.

    Originally Posted at Financial Planning on August 8, 2017 by Bob Veres.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency