We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Ban on fiduciary rule’s class-action waivers won’t be enforced: DOL

    September 7, 2017 by Nick Thornton

    The Labor Department has instructed its field investigators not to enforce the ban on class-action waivers in the fiduciary rule’sprohibited transaction exemptions.

    The rule’s best interest contract exemption and other prohibited transaction exemptions allow brokers, advisors, and insurance agents to receive variable compensation on sales of investment and insurance products in qualified retirement accounts.

    In order to use the exemptions to earn prohibited compensation, such as variable commissions, revenue on proprietary products, or fees on IRA rollovers that are greater than fees paid on assets in 401(k) plans, the contracts can’t include language that waives investors’ right to bring class-action breach of contract claims.

    The announcement that Labor won’t enforce the class-action provision was published in a field assistance bulletin a day before Labor released its proposal to delay the fiduciary rule’s full implementation date by 18 months.

    The BIC Exemption, and its prohibition on class-action waivers, is scheduled for implementation on January 1, 2018.

    Often referred to as the rule’s private right of action, the class-action provision was designed by Obama-era regulators to be the rule’s primary enforcement mechanism.

    It is also among the most contentious provisions of the fiduciary rule. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act has always had a private right of action for participants in employer-sponsored retirement plans.

    But the fiduciary rule extended that right to IRA investors.

    Proponents of the rule say the right to bring class-action claims is necessary to implement an enforceable fiduciary standard across the retirement advice industry.

    Opponents of the rule argue it will expose financial institutions to frivolous lawsuits that will be costly to defend. Some have argued those costs would be passed on to retirement investors. Others say the specter of class-action suits will result in defensive investment practices, including moving lower value accounts to robo advice models, or raising minimum account requirements in order to access personal advice.

     

    No ‘cottage industry’ seen in plaintiffs’ bar

     

    Over the past decade, scores of ERISA claims have been brought against sponsors and providers to defined contribution plans.

    Multi-million dollar settlements in claims brought against Boeing, Lockheed Martin, American Airlines, Cigna, and Nationwide are among the high-profile cases that have garnered headlines. Large 403(b) plans have been targeted over the past year.

    And a rash of new claims have been filed against investment management companies that provide proprietary investments to their own employees.

    By one estimate, nearly $700 million in penalties and settlements in ERISA claims against defined contribution plans were paid between 2009 and 2016, according to data cited by the American Benefits Council, which advocates for large plan sponsors.

    Plaintiffs’ attorneys were awarded $204 million in fees, while the average award for individual plan participants was $116.

    Opponents of the fiduciary rule say those numbers portend what can be expected under the regulation’s private right of action.

    However, the American Association for Justice, the influential trial attorney lobby, says fears of frivolous lawsuits under the fiduciary rule are unfounded.

    “We have not seen a new cottage industry crop up around the fiduciary rule,” said Andrew Rogers, director of legislative affairs at AAJ, in an interview with BenefitsPRO.

    “There is nothing in the rule that will make non-meritorious litigation more appealing,” added Rogers, who describes the AAJ as a strong supporter of the fiduciary rule.

    Beyond saying it won’t enforce the prohibition on class-action waivers in the BIC Exemption, Labor has also said it will grant wide latitude to financial firms that are making a good faith effort to comply with the rule’s impartial conduct standards, which went into effect in June.

    Rogers says courts would honor that guidance. “The rule is designed to deter the worst type of practices,” he said. “If you had litigation attacking firms complying with the spirit of the rule, you will see courts throw those out.”

    Many ERISA attorneys question the merits of the most recent claims against defined contribution plans.

    But that body of law may not directly correlate to class-action claims under the fiduciary rule.

    Marcia Wagner, managing director of the Wagner Law Group, says the millions of dollars industry has deployed to comply with the fiduciary rule is distinct from the complacency of defined contribution investment committees a decade ago, when claims against plans began in earnest.

    “The reality is that there is no accurate way of predicting whether the 401(k) litigation is an appropriate barometer of class action litigation under the fiduciary rule,” Wagner said in an email.

    A moot question

     

    The Trump Labor Department has been unambiguous in its disdain for the fiduciary rule’s private right of action.

    Labor dropped its defense of the private right of action in a lawsuit being considered in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.

    The Department has also asked a federal court in Minnesota to stay a claim against the rule brought by Thrivent Financial.

    Thrivent’s claim was unique from others brought by industry in that it focused exclusively on the rule’s private right of action.

    Attorneys for Thrivent and the Labor Department have been struggling to negotiate the cleanest way to resolve the claim. Thrivent is proposing a motion for preliminary injunction, while Labor says the better course is for the court to stay the litigation.

    In a letter to Judge Susan Richard Nelson, who is presiding over the Thrivent claim, Labor semaphored the release of its enforcement guidance on the BIC’s private right of action.

    “A stay of the litigation is the most efficient way to address this claim regarding a provision that is not currently applicable to plaintiff and which will likely be mooted in the near future,” wrote attorneys for Labor in a letter dated one week before the field assistance bulletin was released.

    Given the energy Labor has put in to disarm the fiduciary rule’s private right of action, Marcia Wagner says it is likely that a rule will emerge that allows financial institutions to waive the right of class actions in contracts with investors.

    Still, Labor will have to devise an alternative enforcement mechanism, says Wagner.

    But the road to that end could have detours.

    One ERISA attorney, speaking on background, said they expect Labor’s enforcement guidance on the private right of action to by challenged by consumer advocate groups.

    Originally Posted at BenefitsPro on August 31, 2017 by Nick Thornton.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency