We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Meet the Annuity Trust on Bernie Sanders’ Hit List

    September 20, 2017 by Allison Bell

    Sen. Bernie Sanders brought the worlds of health insurance, annuities and advanced estate planning together last week when he put together a list of ideas for paying for a shift toward a single-payer health insurance system.

    Few observers expect to see Sanders get his single-payer health insurance system bill, S. 1804, signed into law. The list of financing ideas is not even part of the current text of the bill.

    Click HERE to read the original story via ThinkAdvisor. 

    But Sanders, an independent from Vermont who teams up with the Democrats in the Senate, did shine a spotlight on what has been a powerful estate planning technique: the grantor-retained annuity trust.

    Sanders proposed changing the rules governing GRATs “and other types of trusts and valuation techniques,” citing reports that billionaires have used GRATs and similar techniques to save about $100 billion in taxes since 2000.

    Life insurance agents and other financial professionals with few high-net-worth clients may have wondered what the reference to GRATs was all about, and whether that had anything to do with them.

    Now that Sanders has included the idea of changing the GRAT rules in such a high-profile financing idea document, it might play a more prominent role in conversations about changing the tax code.

    Here’s a look at answers to five basic GRAT questions financial professionals need to understand to talk about the topic.

     

    1. So, what exactly is a GRAT?

    A GRAT is a vehicle an individual, or grantor, can use to transfer property.

    The grantor creates an irrevocable trust. The grantor then puts property into the trust, for a specified period of time, in exchange for getting fixed payments, every year or more often, from the trust. The value of the fixed payments is based on the fair market value of the property put in the trust.

    If the trust period expires before the grantor dies, any value still in the trust goes to the trust beneficiary. The Internal Revenue Service treats the value that goes to the beneficiary as a gift.

    In the trust period expires after the grantor dies, then the GRAT assets become part of the grantor’s estate.

    A grantor who uses a GRAT may be able to avoid having to pay estate taxes or gift taxes on the appreciated value of the property transferred into the GRAT.

    The value of the tax break a GRAT can provide depends on the level of the official interest rate used to value the grantor’s retained interest. The lower the official rate used in the valuations, the more successful the GRAT will be.

    (Related: The Clock Is Ticking on GRATs)

    A shorter trust term also helps increase the odds that the GRAT will succeed in lowering overall taxes.

     

    2. How does anyone know what’s in the GRATs?

    GRATs have been getting attention partly because some high-profile executives at high-profile publicly traded companies have put their companies’ securities GRATs, and filed routine reports on those transactions with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

    The Washington Post, for example, published a 2013 article with the headline “GRAT shelters: An accidental tax break for America’s wealthiest,” and used SEC filings to show that GRAT users include people like Mark Zuckerberg, the chief executive officer of Facebook, and LLoyd Blankfein, the chief executive officer of Goldman Sachs.

     

    3. What have the Democrats said and done about GRATs in the past?

    Former President Barack Obama has been proposing tightening the GRAT rules in annual budget proposals for years. Many of the proposals have involved lengthening the amount of time that the trust used in the GRAT must stay in effect, rather than eliminating the GRAT strategy altogether.

    In 2015, Sanders included a GRAT provision proposing to make the minimum term of a GRAT longer in his Responsible Estate Tax Act bill.

    In August, the IRS proposed a package of Estate, Gift and Generation-Skipping Transfer Taxes regulations. The regulations did not directly refer to GRATs, but a coalition of groups that included the AFL-CIO and Americans for Democratic Action argued in a comment on that draft that the IRS should proceed to “close loopholes like the Grantor Retained Annuity Trust.”

     

    4. What has President Donald Trump’s administration had to say about GRATs?

    The Trump administration and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin have not expressed any specific hostility aimed at GRATs, but they are trying to develop and pass a sweeping tax code simplification package that could have effects on GRATs that are difficult to predict.

     

    5. Why does a doomed proposal floated by Bernie Sanders matter?

    One reason to keep track of this issue is proposals can kick around Washington for many years before becoming law. Advocates of health savings accounts, for example, spent years on unfruitful efforts to get an HSA law, and eventually, got Congress to approve the birth of HSAs.

    Another reason is that, even if GRAT proposals circulate for years, without getting anywhere, talk about the topic could put financial services groups on the defensive.

    Financial services groups and financial services professionals could have to spend time lobbying against GRAT tightening proposals when they would prefer to be talking about new tax incentives for retirement savers, for the purchase of private long-term care insurance, or for other cherished goals. 

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor on September 19, 2017 by Allison Bell.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency