We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (17,756)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (204)
  • Negative Media (139)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (656)
  • Wink's Articles (265)
  • Wink's Inside Story (238)
  • Wink's Press Releases (99)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • 7 Ways the New Tax Fight Could Hit Annuities

    October 3, 2017 by Allison Bell

    For the people who create and sell annuities and other insurance-based retirement planning products, the start of high-energy efforts in Washington to update federal tax rules and programs is creating hope, and fear.

    The efforts could make the economy more efficient, put more money in consumers’ pockets, and leave consumers in a better position to prepare for post-retirement income, acute health care and long-term care needs. The changes could even help the world create the kinds of housing, health care advances, long-term care workforce and long-term care technology that could make the aging of the world’s population easier to handle.

    Click HERE to read the original article via ThinkAdvisor.

    The efforts could also strip away whatever meager incentives the U.S. federal government has given consumers, employers and government entities to prepare for post-retirement expenses. The efforts could also encourage consumers, or government agencies, to get at whatever cash is in existing retirement savings arrangements, and blow it on coffee, restaurant meals, cruises, handbags, cell phone apps, and other items and services that do nothing to put your clients, or the United States as a whole, in a better position to cope with the coming demographic shift.

    Earlier tax reform efforts have come with risks as well as with rewards.

    The 1987 tax reform effort, for example, did clear out some with real estate limited partnerships, and tax evasion strategies often used by high-income taxpayers to escape from sky-high tax rates, but it also contributed to the Oct. 19, 1987, stock market crash, and to the U.S. housing market crash in the early 1990s.

    Republicans in Congress took note of concerns about retirement planning in the new tax reform frameworksummary they released last week.

    The framework summary drafters address those concerns in a section on “Work, Education and Retirement.”

    “The framework retains tax benefits that encourage work, higher education and retirement security,” according to the Work, Education and Retirement section. “The committees are encouraged to simplify these benefits to improve their efficiency and effectiveness. Tax reform will aim to maintain or raise retirement plan participation of workers and the resources available for retirement.”

    But the framework drafters did not give any specifics about annuities, or even about 401(k) plans or individual retirement accounts.

    For a look at seven ways the tax fight could hit the annuity community, and the income planning community in general, read on.

     

    1. The uncertainty could increase the already high uncertainty level.

    Groups involved with annuities put out cautious statements expressing the idea that they would like to back the right kind of tax changes.

    Dirk Kempthorne, the president of the American Council of Life Insurers, said, for example, that, “ACLI knows how important tax reform is a potential facilitator for economic grow, and we would very much like to support tax reform…. ACLI looks forward to reviewing any legislative text to ensure that it strengthens the private sector safety net that millions of Americans rely on for their financial and retirement security.”

    The National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors said its legislative contacts are working to establish and strengthen relationships with every member of Congress, to boost NAIFA’s capacity to serve as a voice of the industry.

    “When NAIFA tells Congress how tax reform will affect our members and the everyday Americans they serve, Congress listens!” NAIFA said. “Together, NAIFA members will help Congress ensure that the tax code works with, not against members’ ability to serve American families and help them prepare for retirement and achieve financial success for decades to come.”

    Cathy Weatherford, president of the Insured Retirement Institute, put out a statement calling for policymakers to recognize the critical need to promote retirement security.

    “Any tax reform legislation that is developed must continue to provide encouragement to Americans to save for their retirement during their working lives,” Weatherford said.

    All that effort to review legislation and reach out to members of Congress takes time and money the groups could be investing, for example, in bigger and better retirement planning awareness campaigns.


    2. The tax fight could revive old efforts to tax annuity contract value while it’s growing, or tax distributions from life insurance policies used in retirement planning.

    Republicans would seem to be in a position to move the needle the other way, but their friendly proposals could lead Democrats to dust off less friendly proposals.

    3. The tax fight could disrupt Medicaid planning strategies.

    Sellers of stand-alone long-term care insurance and life insurance-based long-term care planning arrangements might like to see that, but agents who have used annuities in Medicaid planning efforts may have to change the way they do business.

     

    4. The tax fight could, eventually, replace the current menagerie of savings programs with a few simple savings programs.

    In theory, the simplified savings programs could eliminate many regulatory headaches.

    In the real world, insurer and advisor groups have argued in response to past savings program simplification efforts, the simplified programs could be set up in such a way that they would encourage Americans to reach into their savings every few years to, for example, buy a boat, or an overpriced house, rather than locking the money away for retirement.

    5. The tax fight could disrupt charitable-giving strategies.

    Bernie Sanders has already included an attack on grantor-retained annuity trusts in his proposal for funding a universal, government-run health finance system.

    The new tax fight could bring more of those kinds of proposals out of Democrats’ file cabinets.

    6. The tax fight could lead to upheaval in group health.

    Group health has been working well, thanks, in part, to employers’ group health tax exclusion.

    The Republicans’ new tax framework summary says nothing about whether they intend to keep that exclusion in place. Traditionally, both Republican and Democratic budget hawks have opposed the group health tax exclusion.

    Eliminating the exclusion, combined with other health care system changes, could create new opportunities for insurers to offer annuities, or similar products, as individual health care savings vehicles. But upheaval could also lead to big new distractions for companies, and for the individuals who own or run those companies. That could bite into the amount of time and attention they have to devote to retirement planning for themselves.

    Even life insurers with no major medical operations might find themselves too distracted by the side effects of such a huge shift to focus as well as they should on their core life and annuity operations.

    7. The tax fight could change complicated tax provisions that have helped life insurers weather regulatory uncertainty and low interest rates.

    Life insurers benefit from many tax provisions which are unfamiliar to ordinary people, such as the ability to carry the effects of a net operating loss on taxes forward, or the rules governing taxation of U.S. life insurers’ non-U.S. affiliates.

    Changes in those areas could rattle life insurers’ life and annuity operations. 

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor on October 3, 2017 by Allison Bell.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency