We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,244)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (422)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (804)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Even as DoL reviews fiduciary rule, it’s ready to enforce it

    November 16, 2017 by Kenneth Corbin

    While the Department of Labor may yet revise or rescind the fiduciary rule, the agency also stands ready to bring enforcement actions against advisors who put their interests ahead of clients in egregious cases, says Secretary Alexander Acosta.

    “So long as companies are proceeding in good faith to implement the best interest standard, we are in a compliance assistance mode,” Acosta told members of the House Committee on Education and the Workforce. “But if companies are not proceeding in good faith, we still have enforcement authority. And so if there are willful violations, we do have enforcement authority.”

    Acosta was referring to the first ― and least controversial ― part of the Labor Department’s fiduciary rule, which stipulates that advisors must offer retirement advice that is in the best interest of their clients.

    The department has proposed an 18-month delay for implementing the second part of the rule, which includes contractual requirements that brokers and advisors must follow when providing conflicted advice.

    At Wednesday’s hearing, Acosta did not offer details on how that process might unfold, telling lawmakers only that his department is reviewing feedback gathered from industry members and other stakeholders.

    COORDINATING WITH THE SEC
    He did, however, affirm that Labor is partnering with the SEC as it continues its work on the fiduciary issue, citing his published column calling for close coordination between the two agencies while also taking a shot at Obama-era regulators.

    “I very publicly, as a matter of fact, suggested that the SEC should be a partner in this effort,” Acosta said. “The SEC declined to be a full partner in the past administration and I do believe that they have an important role to play. They are part of the regulatory structure of this industry and should be a partner, and therefore, yes, we have had discussions.”

    Some fiduciary advocates dispute Acosta’s characterization of the SEC’s work with the Labor Department during the Obama administration. Former SEC Chairwoman Mary Jo White repeatedly testified before Congress to her agency’s close working relationship with the Labor Department.

    The department’s fiduciary rule has become an increasingly partisan issue, particularly following President Obama’s public endorsement of the policy. (The labor secretary at the time the rule was promulgated, Tom Perez, now heads the Democratic National Committee.) Some Democrats at Wednesday’s hearing echoed the views of many consumer advocates, lamenting what seems to be a general weakening of regulatory protections they see as important consumer safeguards.

    “We were making some progress under the Obama administration. It seems that some of that progress is being rolled back,” Suzanne Bonamici (D-Oregon), said of the fiduciary rule and other Labor Department regulations that now seem imperiled.

    “We sat in this committee room and had unanimous members of the financial industry say people investing deserve advice that’s in their best interest, so I hope that the department will indeed implement the conflict of interest fiduciary rule,” she said.

    Acosta would not commit to any definite outcome for the rule, but offered an assurance that the issue of ensuring high-quality retirement advice is a top priority at his department and the SEC, borrowing a phrase from SEC Chairman Jay Clayton to make the point.

    “We are working quite diligent[ly] to do what is in the best interest of, as my colleague at the SEC has said, ‘Mr. and Mrs. 401(k),'” Acosta said. “We understand that Americans have worked very hard for their retirement savings. It is important to protect those retirement savings.”

    Originally Posted at Financial Planning on November 15, 2017 by Kenneth Corbin.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency