We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (17,758)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (206)
  • Negative Media (139)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (656)
  • Wink's Articles (265)
  • Wink's Inside Story (238)
  • Wink's Press Releases (99)
  • Blog Archives

  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • 3 Life Sales Innovation Mysteries That Drive Actuaries Wild

    December 5, 2017 by Allison Bell

    Actuaries at the National Association of Insurance Commissioners are trying to figure out what words to use to talk about the new life insurance sales, underwriting and policy issue strategies, so they can analyze how the new strategies affect product performance.

    Click HERE to read the original story via ThinkAdvisor.

    The NAIC’s Life Actuarial Task Force (LATF) included two slidedecks on new life strategies in a packet of materials for task force meeting session. The task force held the session Thursday in Honolulu, at the NAIC’s fall national meeting. The NAIC is meeting in Honolulu from now until Monday.

    One of the slidedecks describes actuaries’ current thinking about guaranteed issue and simplified issue life insurance programs.

    Actuaries want separate data on policies issued through simplified medical underwriting programs.

    Mary Bahna-Nolan, an actuary, developed that slidedeck. Bahna-Nolan is the chair of both the Life Experience Committee at the American Academy of Actuaries and the Preferred Mortality Project Oversight Group at the Society of Actuaries (SOA). She put the logos for both the academy on that slidedeck.

    The second slidedeck deals with accelerated underwriting programs (AUW).

    Bahna-Nolan developed the second slidedeck together with Matt Monson. That slidedeck bears only the SOA logo.

    Members of the LATF group appear to be looking at the guaranteed issue, simplified issue and accelerated underwriting programs mainly because life market players and observers want to have “apples to apples” comparisons of how different types of products are doing, not because anyone has been talking about any significant problems resulting from use of the programs.

    Here’s a look at three highlights from the slidedecks.

    1. Actuaries whether the life insurance policy data they get for certain types of programs is really the right data.

    An actuarial team asked life insurers to send it large amounts of guaranteed issue policy claim data for a study on guaranteed issue mortality, or the death rates for insureds who got covered without having to submit any health-related evidence of insurability.

    One reinsurer told the team that it thinks the overall mortality rates for the data files the team received look so strange that the data files could not all have fit with the team’s definition of “guaranteed issue

    Confidentiality considerations are keeping the reinsurer from disclosing the names of its guaranteed issue clients, and consideration considerations are keeping the mortality study team from naming the companies that sent it guaranteed issue policy claim data.

    The reinsurer and the study team have been trying to dig as deeply as they can to figure out why the mortality rate for the data in the study looks so different from what the reinsurer expected.

    2. Actuaries are wondering whether and how they can really distinguish between terms such as “simplified issue,” “simplified underwriting” and “accelerated underwriting.”

    Bahna-Nolan does not try to summarize the distinctions in the slidedeck, but she notes that commenters have told the study team that the clarifying the distinctions is difficult, especially given the rapid changes happening in the marketplace.

    Challenges interfering with efforts to write actuarially useful definitions include the introduction of new data sources and the wide variety of new industry programs, according Bahna-Nolan.

    A program’s target market and distribution methods could also affect the performance of the products sold, according to Bahna-Nolan.

    3. Actuaries are wondering whether and how they can combine data for policies sold through a number of different strategies that could be classified as accelerated underwriting (AUW) strategies. 

    Today, Bahna-Nolan and Monson note, about 40% of life applicants qualify to use life insurers’ AUW programs, and about 75% could qualify to use AUW processes in the future.

    But “AUW methodology” could refer to use of triage programs, predictive analytics systems, artificial intelligence systems, algorithmic underwriting systems, rules engines, and tele-underwriting systems, according to the AUW slidedeck.

    “There is overlap, but each [method] has distinguishing features,” the actuaries note.

    Some think that AUW mortality results will be better than with conventional underwriting strategies, but some are thinking that mortality could be a little higher, according to Bahna-Nolan and Monson.

    “It really depends on the structure of the program,” according to the actuaries. “Distribution channel has a huge impact.”

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor on December 1, 2017 by Allison Bell.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency