We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,088)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (492)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (827)
  • Wink's Articles (376)
  • Wink's Inside Story (284)
  • Wink's Press Releases (129)
  • Blog Archives

  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • 7 New Peeks Inside Life Insurers’ Underwriting Machinery

    December 29, 2017 by Allison Bell

    A team at the Society of Actuaries has posted a major report on how new life insurance policies really are made.

    Members of the Improving the New Business Process Survey Subcommittee, part of the SOA’s Committee on Insurance Mortality & Underwriting Surveys, persuaded 19 U.S. life insurers and five Canadian life insurers to tell the subcommittee how they bring in new business.

    Click HERE to read the original story via ThinkAdvisor.

    The participating insurers include carriers of all types and sizes, ranging from Erie Family Life to Unum Group’s Colonial Life & Accident unit.

    The participating insurers answered questions about their applications, underwriting requirements, underwriting resources and policy delivery processes.

    A copy of the full survey report is available here.

    The results do not necessarily give a complete picture of what’s really happening in U.S. and Canadian new business processing. The list of major carriers missing includes Brighthouse, MassMutual, New York Life, Northwestern Mutual, Prudential Financial.

    But the results may give readers the start of an idea about how new business processing is working.

    For a look at seven highlights, read on.

    1. How long insurers take to approve cases varies widely.

    Six of the 22 insurers who answered a question about turnaround times said the process fewer than 70% of applications within 30 days.

    Eleven said they process more than 80% of applications within 30 days.

    2. The top underwriting acceleration strategy is low-tech. 

    Twenty-three carriers listed and ranked the changes they made that had the most impact on speeding up underwriting. The survey managers ended up with a total of 60 underwriting acceleration changes.

    The most popular underwriting acceleration change was adjusting age and amount requirements. That strategy came up 12 times.

    Adjusting the underwriting rules engine ranked second; that strategy came up nine times.

    3. The limits on use of automatic policy approval systems vary widely from insurer to insurer.

    The SOA team found, for example, that 14 insurers reported the maximum face amount their systems could approve automatically for a 35-year-old.

    Those insurers reported 12 different automatic underwriting maximums.

    Three insurers set the limit at $500,000.

    The other 11 insurers set their limits at levels ranging from $99,000 to $2 million.

    For 75-year-olds, the automatic underwriting limits ranged from $24,999 to $500,000.

    4. The underwriters’ work-life balance might vary widely.

    Six of the participating carriers let all of their underwriters work from home at least some of the time.

    Thirteen let some underwriters work from home.

    Five never let underwriters work from home.

    5. Electrocardiograms are less popular than they used to be.

    Eleven insurers said they are using the heart assessment procedures about as often as they used to, but 13 said they are decreasing use of electrocardiograms.

    6. The NT-proBNP heart failure test is more popular.

    Three insurers have started using results from that test in the past two years, and 10 insurers have increased their use of that test.

    7. The biggest driver of electronic application flow at the participating insurers is not web-based sales systems. 

    Twenty-one insurers gave the SOA team e-App origination data.

    One insurer, for example, said more than 80% of its e-Apps came in through the worksite marketing channel. No other participating insurer reported getting any e-Apps from the worksite marketing channel.

    Just two insurers said they’re getting e-Apps from online sales systems. One of those carriers is getting fewer than 20% of its e-Apps from online systems, and one is getting somewhere from 21% to 40% of its e-Apps via online systems.

    Insurers’ biggest e-App originators are their most traditional distribution partners: career agents. 

    Ten insurers said they are getting at least some e-Apps from career agents, and seven said more than 80% of their e-Apps come from career agents.

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor on December 28, 2017 by Allison Bell.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency