We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Some Commenters Tell the SEC They Still See Annuity Problems

    July 10, 2018 by Allison Bell

    Annuity issuers and annuity distributors may face a challenge when they’re in negotiations over new annuity sales and marketing standards: new complaints about annuities.

    The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission recently began taking public comments on its effort to develop a best interest standard. The proposed standard would require a broker-dealer to act in the best interest of the retail customer.

    The SEC proposal lacks many of the specific provisions in the U.S. Department of Labor best interest standard guidelines, such as minimum size requirements for indexed annuity wholesalers, that outraged the indexed annuity community.

    Click HERE to read the original story via ThinkAdvisor.

    Comments on the SEC proposal won’t be due until Aug. 7. At press time, the SEC had not posted any comments from insurance or annuity issuer or distributor groups.

    The American Council of Life Insurers moved,  early on, to praise the SEC’s general approach to the topic.

    Leaders of the Fixed Annuity Consumer Choice Campaign have objected, in a comment letter emailed to reporters and others, about the idea of requiring insurance agents who sell indexed annuities to meet anything beyond the current suitability standard.

    The SEC has already posted some early comments submitted by consumers, individual financial professionals, tax preparers, and at least one anonymous operations manager at the regional office of a wirehouse.

    Most of the early comments deal with general investment and retirement savings matters.

    Some of the early comments are highly critical of how at least some annuities have worked in the real world.

    Here’s a sampling at five of the critical comments, to give you a taste of what’s in the hopper now, and what may be in the back of SEC officials’ minds as the officials are revising the SEC’s best interest proposal. The comments are public documents, but we have edited the comments provided here, to take out sections that might invade the privacy of individual people or companies.

    1. Michael Steffens (a consumer)

    “I watched my Dad lose thousands of dollars of retirement money to a shady investment guy who churned him whenever he wanted to buy something new, resulting in a LOT of stress. Unfortunately for Dad, this guy was his nephew, so he overlooked the facts that he wasn’t licensed to sell in Dad’s state, and that he lived really well off people like my father and others. He also put my mother in a 10-year annuity product that would have finished paying at at 90! The result: after Dad’s death, Mom ran out of money in two years, but lived another three after that. This shouldn’t happen to anyone as a result of brokers who are not held to fiduciary standards in managing money.

    “I’m counting on you to make a stronger rule that closes the loophole. Americans who’ve worked hard to save for retirement deserve peace of mind about their financial security.”

    2. Jeffrey Bryan (a consumer)

    “Got ripped-off by a representative (salesman) at huge investment company, lost $32,000 on a bad annuity. The fees went to the salesman, penalties to the company, and taxes to the government. If that sounds un-American and unethical than the SEC needs to do something about it.”

    3. Roxine Moore (a consumer)

    “I was duped by a “financial advisor” … who sold me a variable annuity.  In order NOT to have been duped, I would have to have a university degree in finance and investments, which I don’t have. When he coerced me into buying this product, he had only HIS best interests in mind. This cost me thousands of my retirement dollars while he made thousands off me for himself and his company.

    “I’m counting on you to make a stronger rule that closes the loophole. Americans who’ve worked hard to save for retirement deserve peace of mind about their financial security.”

    4. Barbara Hosmer (a volunteer tax preparer)

    “For the last seven years I have been a volunteer tax preparer in the tax aide program sponsored in our area by AARP.  We provide our services free of charge to the elderly and low income. Every year I have a couple of clients…usually older single WOMEN who have been taken advantage of by nefarious brokers and ’investment professionals.’

    “I see everything from churning (already illegal but still done) to a really bad story this year.

    “A woman diagnosed with  a very deadly cancer decided to get all her finances together here.  She still had an IRA in Texas. [Her bank broker] had her transfer her IRA (ALL OF IT) to them for investment. Needless to say, she had a several thousand dollar tax bill, and investments so complicated she could not explain them to me. They had of course charged her for this service.

    “Another client, again older single woman, had been talked into cashing in an annuity and then sold another one. How many $100 did the broker make off that do you suppose?

    5. Anonymous (operations manager at a wirehouse in South Florida)

    “I am an operations manager for a leading wirehouse in South Florida. I have been in the financial services industry since 1990.1 have experienced a lot of regulatory changes as well as seen a lot of things; some good, some bad.

    “I believe the Best Interest Rule has its merits and can potentially protect investors only if the SEC can coordinate its efforts with all regulatory bodies, including the CFP Association and the Insurance Commission.

    “If not, your proposed rule will fall short and fail.

    “I will explain.

    “Those of us that work at a wirehouse (or reputable broker-dealer) must have certain transactions reviewed and/or pre-approved. Before any of our reps can submit an annuity ticket, it must be pre-approved. Before any of our reps can purchase a penny stock, order must be pre-approved. Before any of our reps can do a mutual fund switch, order must be preapproved.

    “I am not saying that our system is perfect, but we do try our best to do what is in the client’s best interest. In addition, transactions also get reviewed higher up the chain by our regional supervisors and/or compliance department. Bottom line, a supervisor had to review transaction and approve it before it was processed.

    “Many [Certified Financial Planners (CFPs)] that charge fees (level, hourly, annually, level -whatever phrase you would like to use) have no supervision or compliance department reviewing their recommendations or services or portfolios. They believe that they are better than the wirehouses because of their designation. They believe that they were excluded from the [DOL fiduciary rule] because they only charge a fee and not a commission.

    “Well, we have had many new clients come to us that were recommended out of their 401(k) plans or pension plans only to be put into a managed IRA accounts and later find out that they lost their [net unrealized appreciation (NUA)] status or age 55 exemption on their 401(k) plan, or end up with huge penalties from the IRS because they messed up on 72(T) [early distribution rules], which was not properly explained to them; yet the CFP earned his fee.

    “Where I see most investor abuse taking place is in the index / fixed annuity side of the industry.

    “Working in South Florida, we deal with a lot of senior citizens.

    • I have seen new clients come to us looking for information and assistance because they don’t understand what they own. Index annuities can be so confusing with their spreads, caps, and participation rates, that heck, most reps don’t understand them.
    • Investors told that their investments would never lose money, yet they see their account values go down each year because of withdrawals, [and the impact of the withdrawals was] not properly explained to them.
    • Investors told that there are no fees only to find out there is a surrender fee when an emergency comes up. Or the best one is that they were not told that surrender fees apply to each deposit. So when they do go to surrender the annuity, they find out that they have to wait an extra three or four years because of additional deposits that were made.
    • Investors that were sold so many index annuities, that it is now their entire net worth. Or the best is when these index annuity reps pull out the 10% penalty free amount to buy a new index annuity because of the special rate or bonus the client can get.

    “In speaking with these index annuity reps and insurance companies that sell them, we are informed over and over again that these are not securities, that the client signed the application and received the contract, that if there was a problem the client should have asked earlier, yadda yadda yadda.

    “It is terrible what these index annuity reps are doing to investors. Yes, index annuities have their place. We sell them to our clients. But they are not suitable for everyone and there must be some limit as to how much a client owns; no different than any other security.

    “Oh, I forgot, they are not a security; and this is how they get away doing what they are doing. Lying on applications about surrenders, exchanges, how much a client currently owns in annuities or the client’s net worth. All of the things that our compliance department would fry a rep for, these independent index annuity reps get away with.

    “So, as I mentioned earlier, the problem is not the brokers or commissions or the broker dealers; it is having a rule that applies to everyone across the board, all securities, all fee professionals, all products including insurance; and particularly those investments sold by independent insurance agents and general agents that do not appear to have a current pre-approval process in place.

    “Unless this can be accomplished, you will continue to have investors being taken advantage of.”

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor on July 10, 2018 by Allison Bell.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency