We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,155)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (414)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (800)
  • Wink's Articles (353)
  • Wink's Inside Story (274)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • SEC Gives Brokers Free Pass On Fee Disclosures, Fiduciary Group Says

    August 8, 2018 by Tracey Longo

    While SEC officials say their proposed Regulation Best Interest (RBI) will require brokers to disclose conflicts of interest that cost investors, the proposal actually fails to even require that brokers disclose their fees and commissions, the Institute for the Fiduciary Standard said in its comment letter on Monday.

    “This proposal actually does not require brokers to put customers’ interests first, especially in the area of commissions and fees,” institute President Knut Rostad told Financial Advisor magazine.

    It has been widely reported that the SEC is mandating fee disclosure, but that is inaccurate, Rostad said. “The normal person on the street interprets that to mean their broker will tell them what they actually pay or will pay. The SEC is saying, ‘No, no, what brokers are required to disclose is their sources of compensation and how they’re paid only.’”

    Click HERE to read the full story via Financial Advisor.

    The best-interest proposal “explicitly rejects requiring that a broker actually be required to disclose the fees a retail customer pays,” said the public comment letter from the institute, a Washington, D.C.-based advocacy group for independent registered investment advisors (RIAs).

    The lack of fee disclosure is noteworthy since conflicted advice and hidden commissions and fees costs investors some $17 billion annually, according to the White House.

    “We are not proposing a requirement that firms personalize the fee disclosure for their retail customers,” the SEC said in its proposal.

    The agency, the institute says, wants brokers to discuss broadly “certain categories of fees they should expect to pay.” But it goes on to say that the SEC “explicitly rejects requiring that a broker actually be required to disclose the fees a retail customer pays.”

    Overall, the proposal “fails to provide a real best-interest standard and fails to require or urge that brokers eliminate conflicts or even mitigate them in any concrete and specific way,” the institute said.

    Ironically, the institute noted, “RBI worries that if brokers eliminate conflicted recommendations they will lose revenue and their customers will be harmed by not buying these products.”

    “RBI represents a major step towards codifying in SEC rulemaking principles and practices that further de-emphasize conflicts of interest and codes of ethics and differences between brokers and advisers, while advancing disclosure as the bulwark of investor protection,” the institute maintained in its SEC letter. Currently, registered investment advisors are held to a fiduciary standard of care, while brokers operate under Finra’s suitability standard.

    “RBI policies and procedures provide no requirements nor offer uniform guidance, and do not define ‘mitigation’ or ‘best interest.’ B-Ds have the flexibility to do largely what they like,” the institute said.

    “The institute cannot support RBI as proposed. It requires a major reengineering … to meet the requirements of a real fiduciary standard. We welcome the opportunity to assist the SEC in doing so,” the institute said.

    The worst-case scenario, Rostad said, is that the proposal will be adopted as is by the SEC, giving brokers the right to market themselves as acting in investors’ best interests without having to adhere to a fiduciary standard.

    “Bottom line is brokers will be liberated to carry a fiduciary-equivalent flag unabashed, in a way they have not been able to before,” he said.

    Originally Posted at Financial Advisor on August 6, 2018 by Tracey Longo.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency