We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,225)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (420)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (803)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Is the commission-based annuity market primed for disruption?

    October 10, 2018 by Nick Thornton

    Annuities have long been the whipping boy of the financial services industry, and for good reason, thinks David Lau, founder and CEO of DPL Financial Partners.

    “Insurance products have forever had a very bad reputation,” he said.
    Lau is not a plant or acolyte of Ken Fisher’s, the head of Fisher Asset Management who in advertisements claims he would “die and go to hell” before recommending an annuity product to retirement investors.

    Click HERE to read the original story via BenefitsPro.

    In fact, Lau spent a decade as chief operating officer for Jefferson National Life Insurance Company.

    In that role, he set out in 2004 to explore distribution inroads to fee-only fiduciary RIAs, who by law are prohibited from accepting the commissions affixed to the vast majority of insurance products.
    What he found when he led that seminal effort were intransigent barriers to the RIA market and its investors, which account for $2.5 trillion in assets nationwide.

    “I got to understand the problem that insurance is for RIAs,” Lau told BenefitsPRO. “Every other investment product is available to fiduciary advisors on a no-load basis. This was an insurance industry problem that clearly needed to be addressed.”

    Ken Fisher may not have to go to hell after all
    As the Labor Department spent years crafting a fiduciary rule that put sales of commission-based variable and fixed indexed annuities squarely in its crosshairs, more carriers rolled out fee-based alternatives in an effort to shield incumbent broker distribution channels from liability under the rule.

    Fee-based products’ market share grew, but nonetheless remained fractional compared to commission-based products.

    The most recent data from LIMRA Secure Retirement Institute shows that FIAs enjoyed a record-setting second quarter in 2018. But fee-based FIAs represented less than one-half of one percent of the total FIA market.

    Those numbers reflect how most fiduciaries regard annuities. Fisher’s views on the products are shared by the vast majority of RIAs, says Lau.

    “No one will argue against the value of guaranteed lifetime income or principal protection—those insurance benefits are inarguable, and certainly valuable for the right RIA client,” says Lau.

    But those indisputable values come with a “pricing problem” for RIAs, who are legally beholden to place their client’s interests first. The costly, complex, and often opaque product features of annuities inherently challenge fiduciaries’ obligation of prudence to investors, said Lau.

    Addressing the pricing problem was the primary motivation behind DPL Financial Partners, which officially launched a platform for fee-based insurance products– specifically for fiduciary RIAs–last February.

    “The insurance industry is ripe for disruption in terms of pricing and transparency—two things RIAs value,” explained Lau. “I thought the better way of handling this problem and working with fiduciary advisors would be to do it from an independent point of view, and to work with carriers across the industry to help them better understand the RIA market. And then go to the RIAs with a product-agnostic point of view, one that aligns with their fiduciary values.”

    Beyond access to commission-free insurance products, DPL’s network serves as an outsourced insurance department for RIAs. The platform vets existing fee-based products, and Lau’s team works with carriers to create new offerings or enhance existing options.

    DPL also audits insurance products when they do exist in RIA client portfolios, and works with RIAs that don’t offer insurance to identify clients that could benefit from income streams and other protections.

    RIAs pay an annual fee to access the platform and services. Insurance companies do not pay for space on the platform, as they do on broker and wirehouse platforms, but they are charged an administrative fee, which Lau said is a fraction of traditional commission expenses.

    In seven months, DPL has signed 125 RIA firms, which range in size from $50 million in AUM to $20 billion.

    Allianz, TIAA, Great West, AXA, Great American, Security Benefit, Columbus Life, CBLife, and Integrity Life are the carriers listing products on the platform, which include investment-only variable annuities, FIAs, fixed annuities, and life insurance products.

    Under one analysis provided by DPL, an unnamed fee-based product comes with annual costs that are about one-third of a traditional commission-based counterpart.

    The largest savings are on mortality and expense fees, which range from 50 to 150 basis points in commission-based products that guarantee income. Morningstar says the average M&E charge on variable annuities is 135 basis points. DPL’s platform has products with charges as low as 20 basis points.

    KISS for RIAs
    Along with pricing, product complexity has been the primary hurdle for RIAs.

    “You want to design products that are more straightforward,” said Lau. “A lot of annuities come with bells and whistles designed to sell the product, but RIAs are not selling products—they are buying them.”

    Lau sees insurance investments as another product in the RIA toolkit. They would not change an RIA’s annual fee on AUM. Fees on insurance products would be paid by investors, just as they pay management fee costs on mutual funds.

    According to Lau, the investor wins with access to products through their RIA that could better secure retirement income, protect principal, and create tax advantages. The RIA wins by not having to move clients out the door to access insurance. And carriers win by detaching large commissions from their products, and in turn reducing liability that comes with incentivizing sales forces with commissions.

    “This is an industry evolution that I think has to happen,” said Lau, who predicts an ongoing fiduciary movement even though Labor’s rule is off the books.

    “The fiduciary world is coming because of a lot of stimuli—not just regulations. Transparency is a societal and consumer evolution. That’s the permeating point of view throughout the financial services industry,” said Lau. “We just want to be part of the stimulus.”

    Originally Posted at BenefitsPro on October 10, 2018 by Nick Thornton.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency