We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!


media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us


Close [x]

Industry News


  • Industry Articles (16,283)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (9)
  • Negative Media (138)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (605)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (171)
  • Wink's Articles (235)
  • Wink's Blogs (216)
  • Wink's Press Releases (94)
  • Blog Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • The ABCs of Structured Annuities

    October 26, 2018 by Scott Stolz


    Today, registered index-linked annuities, buffered annuities, index-linked variable annuities and structured annuities are all used to describe a single product. Given the many names for this relatively new annuity structure, I suspect there is some confusion as to what these products are and when they should be recommended.

    I refer to these products as structured annuities because the insurance industry based the design on structured notes offered by most broker-dealers. Structured notes are bank debt obligations that return principal plus interest linked to underlying markets while still providing some downside protection. Structured annuities are similar to structured notes, but offer the potential for tax-deferred growth.
    How do they compare to other annuities? Let’s start with what they are and what they are not. Like an indexed annuity, the return during the selected period is tied to a particular index, such as the S&P 500 or the MSCI EAFE.

    However, structured annuities allow the policyholder to capture much more of the upside of the index than an indexed annuity. Of course, this can’t happen without a tradeoff. Unlike an indexed annuity, a structured annuity merely protects some of the downside and can cause a policyholder to lose money, similar to a variable annuity.
    When initially investing in this product, all structured annuities require the policyholder to make three choices that are essentially the same as an indexed annuity: 1) The duration of the interest crediting segment, typically from one to six years; 2) the index used to determine account value performance (e.g., S&P 500, MSCI EAFE, etc.); and 3) the crediting method, which entails the following:

    A cap on earnings: Performance is limited to a certain amount of the underlying index return. For example, with a 95% cap on performance, policyholders will receive positive returns up to 95% over the life of the product. So if the index returned 60%, the policyholder would receive 60%, but if the index returned 110% over the life of the product, the policyholder would receive 95% (the cap).

    A trigger or step rate: Policyholders receive a specific, predetermined return if the underlying index is either up or unchanged from its initial level. For instance, if the trigger or step rate is 6% and the client selects the S&P 500 index, then the client will receive 6% as long as the S&P 500 is not lower than its initial level during the selected term.
    A spread or annual fee deducted to calculate the final return: Like an indexed annuity, some structured annuities offer options that have higher participation rates in exchange for an annual fee or spread. This additional cost is deducted from any gains. The idea behind this approach is to provide more upside in the years where the index performs well above historic averages.

    Policyholders essentially pay for this privilege by accepting lower returns in the years where the index is positive but below historic averages. For instance, with a 1.25% annual fee or spread on any gains, if an underlying index returned 5%, the policyholder would receive 3.75% of that gain. If the index returned 20%, the policyholder would receive 18.75%.

    Over the long run, back testing would indicate the fee or spread options should provide a boost on the overall average return depending on the index performance. (Please note: past performance is not an indication of future results.) However, it will also lead to a wider expected range of possible returns.

    The actual return will be based on the selected index over the selected time period, subject to the limit on the upside, just like an indexed annuity.

    Types of Downside Protection Unlike an indexed annuity, though, structured annuities require the policyholder to choose the amount and type of downside protection. The more downside protection the policyholder elects, the less potential upside they will receive. Typically, structured annuities will offer two methods of limiting downside exposure.

    1. “Buffer” against a loss. Structured annuities typically offer a “buffer” of 10%, 20%, or 30%. This percentage represents the total amount of downside protection.

    For example, if the policyholder selects a 10% buffer, then the policyholder is protected against any loss as long as the chosen index does not decline more than 10%. To elaborate, if the index over the selected period returned -15%, the policyholder would incur a loss of 5%. Similarly, if the policyholder selects a 20% buffer, then no loss occurs unless the index returns a loss of more than 20%. Not surprisingly, the larger the buffer, the lower the upside potential.

    Actual pricing may look as follows, though the scenarios and information described herein are hypothetical in nature and are not indicative of the performance of any particular investment or annuity. They are for illustrative purposes only and should not be considered as the sole basis for any investment decision.

    • Example 1: 3 years; S&P 500 index; 10% buffer; 35% cap on index performance over 3 years.
      Example 2: 6 years; S&P 500 index; 10% buffer; 95% cap on index performance over 6 years.
      Example 3: 6 years; S&P 500 index; 25% buffer, 65% cap on index performance over 6 years.

    2. “Guard Strategy.” With this option, the policyholder is exposed to the percentage loss up to the guarded amount, but is protected against any loss after the guard percentage. Therefore, this method works the opposite of the “buffer” method.

    For example, if the policyholder selects a 10% guard, then he or she is subject to a loss of up to 10%. If the index over the selected period of time generates more than a 10% loss, then the insurance company covers the loss beyond the 10%.

    The smaller the guard selected by the policyholder, the greater the exposure for the insurance company. As a result, the client will get less upside potential. Actual pricing may look as follows in one example: a 1-year product tied to the S&P 500 index with a 10% guard could have a 10.75% cap on performance over a 1-year term.

    When Should You Consider a Structured Annuity? In my view, structured annuities are not an alternative to fixed and indexed annuities. Rather, these annuities may offer an alternative to variable annuities. People who buy fixed annuities want full downside protection and want to know they are going to receive a positive return. Index annuity holders are comfortable with an unknown return each year — even a 0% return on occasion — but like the fixed annuity policyholders, they want to protect their principal.

    While structured annuities often provide an option that completely protects principal, the pricing is typically inferior to that of an indexed annuity, and, hence, is rarely an attractive option. Because the most competitive aspects of a structured annuity do not fully protect the downside, they are not the best solution for the most risk-averse client.

    However, with more upside participation in exchange for more downside exposure, structured annuities could fill the need solved by a variable annuity. These products may provide much of the upside that could be captured with a variable annuity (without a living benefit), while still protecting the client from a significant market correction.

    Structured annuities could be particularly attractive to clients who currently own variable annuities and/or mutual funds and would like to take some risk off of the table without fully exiting equity markets.

    Accumulation, Not Income Because annuities may not be right for all clients, there are many things to consider before making a recommendation. First and foremost, you must determine the role of the annuity: Is it to fill an income need or an accumulation need?

    If the purpose of the annuity is to provide either current or future income, then you would likely recommend either an immediate annuity (SPIA), deferred income annuity (DIA), or an annuity with a living benefit rider. Structured annuities, to date, do not offer living benefit riders and are typically priced under the assumption that the policyholder only holds the policy through the surrender charge period. While policyholders can annuitize structured annuities, these products are not about income, and should not be considered an income solution for clients.

    However, structured annuities may be able to fulfill the accumulation need. By offering a means to capture some of the market upside while protecting some or much of the market downside, these products are “designed to provide some stability in an unpredictable endeavor — investing,” as described by Brighthouse Financial.

    Therefore, I believe these products are best suited for clients who indicate they want to either gain or maintain some exposure to equity markets but are more concerned with losing money than making money. I describe this typical structured annuity client as a “chicken equity investor” — the client who says they want to be in the market, but you know is going to panic if the market goes through any significant correction (or maybe even one that is not so significant).

    Take a look at your clients’ goals, objectives, and risk tolerances. For those “chicken equity investors” who want some upside market participation and some downside protection in a tax-deferred wrapper, you may consider exploring structured annuities.



    Scott Stolz is Senior Vice President, Raymond James Private Client Group Investment Products and Wealth Solutions.

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor, Commentary on October 25, 2018 by Scott Stolz.

    Categories: Industry Articles