We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,890)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (36)
  • Moore on the Market (472)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (823)
  • Wink's Articles (371)
  • Wink's Inside Story (280)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • What Ohio National’s Annuity Trail Cutoff Means for Advisors, BDs

    October 9, 2018 by Jon Henschen

    After an extended period of failing to get results out of buyout offers on its variable annuities, Ohio National has decided to stop paying trailing commissions on some variable annuities. Going one step further, the firm will also stop the data feed to advisors, leaving clients to fend for themselves.  

    We checked with several broker-dealers on the matter and heard some contradictory feedback. One mid-size broker-dealer commented that its reps would continue to receive trails and data feed, so no change; another mid-size firm, though, said it would not get trails but could continue to service the Ohio National products.

    Click HERE to read the original story via ThinkAdvisor. 

    Besides the inconsistencies, many broker-dealers will be out of the loop on both trails and data feeds. Group VAs and life insurance were excluded from any restrictions.

    Ohio National is not going to make any change on trails or servicing ability for its own advisors at Ohio National Equity — essentially making those advisors captive — for fear of losing VA trails and the ability to service those products if they were to leave for another firm.   

    Insurance companies have been on a slippery slope in terms of advisor relations, starting with MetLife back in September 2017. At that time, MetLife cut compensation on fixed and variable annuities trails sold by former advisors who moved to broker-dealers other than the firm they sold to, Mass Mutual Life Insurance Company.  

    MetLife cut trails to 27% of current levels; if advisors were receiving a 1% trail, they would now get only 27 basis points. This cut in trails also applied to any MetLife advisor that left Mass Mutual, which like Ohio National, makes advisors captive to the broker-dealer if they have sizable MetLife annuity products.  

    Ohio National has gone one step further than MetLife by not only getting rid of the trail all together, but also by cutting off the data feed so the advisor will be unable to service the variable annuity product.

    MetLife’s motive was to punish those advisors who did not go along with the sale of MetLife representatives to Mass Mutual. However, Ohio National is making this move out of financial hardship, as it pockets the trails to offset losses on its VA product.  

    Ohio National told the press, “The firm’s new strategy of focusing on its life insurance and disability income insurance is consistent with our fiduciary duty to policyholders.”

    Impact of Ohio National’s Moves

    The irony is that cutting off advisors servicing VA products they have sold to clients is anti-fiduciary and harmful to policyholders.

    Without advisors being able to protect their clients’ best interests, clients will need to go to the insurance company for advice on issues such as buyout offers, which would be a conflict of interest — with the fox in charge of the hen house.  

    Advisors hearing about these moves will be more apt to take the full upfront commission, feeling that they may never see any trail or may be turned off to the VA product all together by such tactics.

    Insurance companies could very well end up shooting themselves in the foot as trust in product predictability erodes.

    By cutting advisors out of the servicing loop on VAs, legal repercussions are likely to follow, and then we may see back peddling by Ohio National.

    The takeaway for broker-dealers would be to pull the selling agreement on any insurance carrier attempting to do buyouts of a VA product. That could help keep the broker-dealer from accumulating too large a position that later might prove problematic.

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor on October 9, 2018 by Jon Henschen.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency