We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (15,459)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (9)
  • Negative Media (134)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (572)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (157)
  • Wink's Articles (216)
  • Wink's Blogs (204)
  • Wink's Press Releases (89)
  • Blog Archives

  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Annuity Compensation: Commission vs. Fees

    July 22, 2020 by Sheryl J. Moore

    I recently achieved a new status in the insurance industry: social influencer.

    And never, in my decades of insurance experience have I witnessed a debate on social media that is more heated and passionate than that of fee-based advisors versus those who are commissioned.

    The argument?

    Click HERE to read the original story via NAILBA

     

     

    “One cannot act in the client’s best interests, unless they are a fiduciary who does not get paid a commission.”

    Fiduciaries often argue that because they are not paid commissions, that they are uniquely positioned to offer conflict-free advice. Further, these fee-based or fee-only advisors contend that the lack of commissions on their product offerings, ensure that their clients are receiving maximum value.

    On the other hand, commissioned advisors counter that their clients end-up paying less for their advice. In addition, these commission-earning advisors suggest that the product offerings of fee’d advisors may not be superior to their own wares.

    I decided, as the third-party/neutral product expert, to test the argument as it relates to indexed annuities.

    While there are 504 different indexed annuities available for sale through 67 different insurance companies today, 30 of those products are fee-based annuities that are offered via 12 different insurers. I narrowed-down our study to sixteen annuities, offered by eight different insurance companies. I selected commissioned and fee-based annuities for each company in the study, making careful to match apples-to-apples (as much as possible) in terms of surrender charge periods, indexed interest offerings, and more.

    Our study was further-limited by reviewing 5-8-year products, depending on company offerings. Thereafter, we focused solely on annual point-to-point indexing methods, based on the S&P 500 index, subject to a cap rate. The outcomes were enlightening.

    The Argument on Rates
    Fiduciaries often contend that by giving-up the commission on their annuities, the client can obtain preferential rates. We found that to be true in our study, which illustrated that the difference in cap rates ranged from 0.00% – 1.40% in favor of the fee-based product; the median difference being 0.77%.

    That said we put the caps for both annuities into action and tested the products with the greatest difference in caps, in a steadily increasing market environment. Over an eight-year period, the fee-based annuity would have accumulated nearly $10,146 more indexed gains than the commissioned annuity, assuming a $100,000 premium.1 Score one for fee-based advisors.

    The Argument on Compensation
    A common fiduciary claim is that his/her compensation for the sale is far less than their commissioned counterpart. We asked my social network of tens upon tens of thousands about the typical asset management fee. The responses suggested that this fee generally ranges from 1.00% – 2.00%, depending on the client/advisor; we will assume a median 1.50% annual asset management fee in our study.

    While some may perceive that the commissioned advisor is paid considerably more than the fee-based advisor, our study concluded that “it depends.” We found that the typical fee-based advisor’s total compensation remained less than the commissioned advisor’s until year four of the contract.2 However, when reviewing total compensation at the end of the eight-year surrender charge period, results show that the fee-based advisor received nearly 250% more compensation than the commissioned salesperson over the same period. Score one for commissioned advisors.

    The Best Interest Argument
    It can be said that fee-based advisors have more motivation to “act in their clients’ best interests,” as they make the same amount of money, regardless of which product/solution they suggest to the client. While that may be true, I have read about plenty of slimy “fiduciaries.” Ever hear of that Madoff guy?

    And while commissioned salespeople are not legally obligated to a fiduciary standard, I have met a great many commissioned advisors who always put their clients first. Can commission be a motivating factor? Yes, and I have read about the folks that sold double-digit surrender charge annuities to consumers on their deathbeds. That said, the salesperson may be a crook, regardless of the product that is sold. Commission is not the only thing that helps identify one of the “bad guys/gals.”

    There are bad apples in every barrel of the financial services industry.

    As you know, I do not endorse any company or product. Therefore, the commission versus fee argument is lost on me. When you get to the bottom of it, my perspective is that both advisors are being paid; one way, or another, as a part of the annuity transaction. It just may be easier to find a commissioned advisor that sells annuities, than a fee-based or fee-only advisor.

    And everyone could use better annuity rates right now; caps are just crummy across-the-board. That said, one could absolutely make the argument that consumers could potentially receive more earnings on a fee-based annuity, than a commissioned product.

    Ultimately, I am just grateful for any and all opportunities to educate consumers about the existence of annuities, and whether (or not) they may be a viable purchase for their retirement goals. After all, the number one fear of Americans is running-out-of-money in retirement. And annuities are the ONLY financial services instrument that can guarantee the purchaser a paycheck for the rest of their life; even if they live to be 150 years old! ALL of you are financial evangelists: commissioned or fee-based.

    So what do you say that we all bury the hatchet, accept our differences, and “play nice in the sandbox” together? If we focus on forging-forward and creating new relationships, as opposed to bashing one another, we could increase the financial IQs of a great many more people! Retirement problem, solved!

    1Assumes a 2.55% cap for the commissioned annuity and a 3.95% cap for the fee-based annuity
    2Assumes a 5.57% average heaped commission option for an independent agent commission on a 65-year old annuitant

    Sheryl Moore is President and CEO of the life and annuity market research firm of Wink, Inc. Her company provides competitive intelligence, market research, product development, consulting services and insight to select financial services companies. She may be reached at sjm@intelrockstar.com.

    Originally Posted at NAILBA on July 2020 by Sheryl J. Moore.

    Categories: Sheryl's Articles
    currency