We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,131)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (413)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (799)
  • Wink's Articles (352)
  • Wink's Inside Story (273)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Guarantees, ‘De-Risking’ Were Top Product Trends In 2009

    January 7, 2010 by Linda Koco

    The Great Recession continued in 2009 and so did its impact on insurance products.

    Once again, guarantees were a major part of the product story—in terms of sales and product features. But another trend reared its head too—de-risking. That is, carriers sought to better manage risk exposure as part of their efforts to strengthen capital reserves. In the process, many insurers increased prices, reduced feature selection, placed occasional moratoriums on sales of certain products, and/or exited certain markets or lines.

    This occurred as industry-wide sales of life, annuities, long term care and many other products slid, with only a few firms reporting sales growth.

    Here is how various professionals around the country saw it all play out.

    Guarantees

    “It was a banner first quarter for sales of fixed annuities,” says Steve Clemens, vice president-life marketing at URL Financial Group, a Harrisburg, Pa. brokerage. He attributes this to the annuity guarantees. (When interest rates fell and some carriers had rating downgrades later in the year, sales did slow down, he adds, but the guarantees were still important.)

    At his firm, the fixed sales were strongest among health agents and financial planners whose clients lost health care coverage or were concerned about what would happen to their coverage due to possible health reform, he adds. “Those clients wanted guarantees or fixed interest products, to protect their money.”

    The story was similar at carriers. Advisor inquiries about guarantees were up during the year, reports Chris Littlefield, CEO of Aviva USA, Des Moines, Iowa.

    In addition, consumers became more accepting of products that guarantee safety, he points out, citing Aviva research on waning consumer confidence in the wake of the decline in equities. That spurred interest in “pre-packaged solutions,” such as indexed, fixed and income annuities, he says. Nearly 50% of Aviva’s indexed annuity business includes guaranteed withdrawal income benefits, he notes.

    Guarantees were a big story for variable annuities, too. For instance, “about 90% of our third quarter VA sales had some form of guaranteed living benefit attached,” says Steve Deschenes, senior vice president and general manager-annuities at Sun Life Financial U.S., Wellesley Hills, Mass. The turmoil of 2009 impacted retirement confidence, he says, so consumers not only wanted to retire later but also to have guarantees in their insurance products.

    Life insurance sales were also influenced by guarantees. “There was a flight to safety and security in life insurance” due to all the economic instability, says Melissa A. McConville, vice president-brokerage of Kiselis Brokerage Services, Inc., San Antonio, Tex.

    That drove life sales, she says, pointing to an uptick in sales of no-lapse universal life as one example. Kiselis saw a 50% increase in requests for applications and illustrations for these products, despite the price increases many carriers had instituted, she says. The products were selling well mostly in the older age market, age 55 and up, McConville notes.

    So, too, at many life insurers. Before the economic meltdown, no-lapse UL was the most popular product, recalls Dan Mulheran, president–retail life distribution at ING, Minneapolis. “Now, for us, it is even more so,” he says, surmising that “people are still looking for certainty.” The same is true with whole life, he says, noting WL sales rose.

    In fact, WL was a “bright spot” in 2009, says Mike Fanning, executive vice president, MassMutual, Springfield, Mass., with his firm’s WL policy count up 21% in the first 9 months, and WL premium up 9%.

    New York Life attributes its 8% increase in life sales during the first 9 months to its “safe secure products,” as well as its financials and other factors.

    At Aviva USA, traditional and indexed UL sales typically included a no-lapse guarantee, notes Littlefield.

    De-risking

    De-risking was “important work” that life carriers did in 2009, according to Sun Life’s Deschenes.

    The year was “all about navigating the financial crisis and de-risking and making product refinements to balance risk to benefit customers, shareholders and advisors,” he explains.

    On the annuity side, some carriers left the market, either by product or product changes, Deschenes points out. Others were effectively removed from the market due to rating downgrades and the subsequent loss of distributors. Others, however, figured out how to sell their products but to be prudent about it in a long-term way, he says.

    The refinements were designed to fund profitably at the right level of risk and return, Deschenes says.

    Examples in VAs included setting withdrawal tiers and greater restriction on asset allocation, he continues. Some carriers also reduced the number of funds in their VAs or the maximum on equities available or in the allocation, he says. Others raised the price on rider fees.

    On the fixed annuity side, volatility in the credit markets spurred a lot of flow into the business, especially into products of insurers with strong brands and balance sheets, he adds.

    Low crediting rates did put pressure on fixed sales in mid-year, however.

    In 2009, Deschenes sums up, “most of the work was on getting the crediting rates right.” There was no particular innovation in annuities, whether book value or market value adjusted, and the product portfolios did not change dramatically, he says.

    On the life side, the carriers who were struggling with the credit crunch in 2009 did impact the market, points out Gary Victorson, a brokerage general agent with Victorson Associates Inc., Smithtown, N.Y.

    Many announced plans to raise their term life insurance rates, he recalls. “That caused a scramble to get pending cases into the carriers before the deadline.”

    It also became tough at times to replace business written in the last five or 10 years, he adds.

    The capital crunch was definitely a top factor in the life market, agrees Aviva’s Littlefield. “Everyone looked at their life products, and how to make them more capital efficient,” he recalls, adding that carriers did “tremendous” work on this, analyzing solutions and cost implications.

    But life policies were impacted by another factor as well. The changeover from the old 1980 Commissioners Standard Ordinary tables to the 2001 CSO caused a sea change in life products. This pushed carriers to retool their entire portfolios, says ING’s Mulheran, noting that the new life products look like the older ones, but they have more constrained cash values.

    Some life carriers dropped 30-year level term policies and/or pulled out the return-of-premium term market, and many increased term prices and non-commissioned policy fees, says URL’s Clemens.

    Despite that, he says, the year was a big one for his firm. Term sales were strong, particularly for 20-year level term followed by 10-year LT. Clemens attributes that to the distribution channels his firm used for these products—planners, health insurance advisors and agents who are not focused on life sales—and to the use of products that can be sold with a quick, short-form online application, which these producers prefer.

    Some other trends from 2009 were:

    Hybrid UL and LTC: Individual LTC sales slumped, but sales of UL with LTC or chronic condition acceleration riders were strong, especially among clients age 50+ who wanted an affordable LTC benefit, Clemens says. Lincoln Financial Group, Radnor, Pa., reports that hybrid UL with LTC sales were up 17% in the first 9 months compared to last year.

    Indexed annuities. “We saw more people migrating to indexed solutions,” says Littlefield. The IA has less volatility than the VA because it is a non-correlated asset, he says, so that accounts for much of its appeal.

    Indexed UL: This product line continued to grow, Mulheran says, noting that at ING, an IUL introduced earlier this year has seen seven-figure monthly production. At Aviva, IUL sales were level to modestly increasing during the first three quarters, says Littleton.

    Income annuities: People were looking for more joint and survivor immediate annuities in 2009, reports John A. Kiselis, president and CEO of Kiselis Brokerage Services, Inc.

    Kiselis’ firm has also been offering “joint and percent contingent immediate annuities,” which enable the primary annuitant to receive the full amount, even if the survivor dies first. (If the primary annuitant dies first, the secondary annuitant gets the percentage was selected at issue.)

    Bad press. The big news for Michael Bodack, president of Sequoia Brokerage, Yonkers, N.Y., is “the understanding role of the press in the insurance marketplace.” Last year, he says, certain carriers offering ULs with no-lapse guarantees were top sellers. But in 2009, some of those carriers “jumped away” from the product due to concerns about their ability to support the guarantees over the long term. “That made the news, and now I can’t give (the products of those carriers) away, let alone sell them,” he says.

    Equities market impact. The equities market decline made people realize they can’t safely peel off 6% from equities portfolios for retirement income any more, says Victorson. “They also no longer have the stomach to put 100% with a money manager.” So, a lot of the money that’s going into fixed annuities and immediate annuities is now coming from equities, he says. “That was a big change in 2009.”

    Falling interest rates. Fixed annuity interest rates kept falling during the year, to the point that they became so low that many stopped buying fixed annuities and 10-year certain single premium immediate annuities, says Victorson. “Clients say they don’t want to lock in; they want to wait for rates to go back up,” he says. “In the past, it was easier to sell those policies. But now, it’s easier to sell lifetime SPIAs.”

    Critical illness insurance. About 90% of CI sales were in the group and worksite insurance markets, says Dan Pisetsky, president of US Living Benefits LLC, Old Lyme, Conn. and founder of the National Assn. for Critical Illness Insurance. “Many brokers were selling CI as gap coverage for high deductible health care plans,” he says.

    Originally Posted at National Underwriter on December 21, 2009 by Linda Koco.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency