We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,131)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (413)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (799)
  • Wink's Articles (352)
  • Wink's Inside Story (273)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Top 10 Index Annuity Misconceptions

    January 9, 2010 by Sheryl J. Moore

    Published 8/19/2007 

    Imagine a neighbor knocks on your door, complaining he is “tired of your kids misbehaving and acting out of control.” Claiming he’d be a better parent than you, he picks up your kids and takes them home.

    Wild imagination? Not if we’re talking index annuities. Last month, the Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Christopher Cox behaved like that angry neighbor. He charged that too many index annuity agents are engaging in abusive sales practices and then proposed regulating IAs as securities, not insurance. In effect, he wants to take IA regulation away from the states and give it to the SEC.

    A careful reading of the SEC’s 96-page proposed Rule 151A (File No. S7-14-08) makes clear that the SEC has some major misconceptions about IAs. It’s time to debunk them. Here’s my Top 10 List. (Note: all supporting data below come from research by Annuityspecs.com.)

    Misconception 10: All IAs have high surrender charges. Actually, over 45% of IAs sold had 10-year surrender charges as of 1Q 2008. Note: NBC-TV’s Dateline exposé on IA sales earlier this year highlighted an IA with a 16-year surrender charge, but it was one of only 2 index annuities having the longest surrender charge duration in the industry. Ignored was the fact that some IA surrender charges are as short as 1 year.

    Misconception 9: All IAs pay big bonuses. Not so. Many IA advertisements do involve big bonuses of, say, 10%. However, top selling IAs tend to have more modest bonuses. As of 1Q 2008, for instance, over 23% of all IAs sold had a 5% premium bonus. Keep in mind that carriers usually need a longer surrender charge to offset a premium bonus, so some of these IAs have longer surrender charges.

    Misconception 8: All IAs pay high commissions. In reality, the average street level commission for all IAs as of 1Q 2008 was 6.89%. Judged by IAs sold, the average IA agent commission was 8% of premium in that quarter. One IA did pay as high as 13%, but keep in mind that some IAs pay as low as 1%; also, IA commissions are paid one time in exchange for the agent servicing the policy for the entire term.

    Misconception 7: IAs are just used to target seniors. Let’s get real. Do cereal companies “target” children with breakfast cereal? No, but children are the primary demographic for cereal, just as seniors are for index annuities. IAs are retirement income products, folks, and usually people retire when they become seniors. Gasp! How predatory of the financial services industry. (Note: The average IA issue age in 1Q 2008 was 63.)

    Misconception 6: IAs are investments. Wrong! IAs are a safe money place, comparable to other safe money places such as CDs and traditional fixed annuities. To compare IAs to “risk money” places, such as variable annuities and mutual funds, is apples-to-oranges. Consumers buying IAs want the safety of guarantees with the potential of some extra upside potential; they are too risk-averse for securities.

    Misconception 5: IAs have countless consumer complaints. In my review of closed consumer complaints of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners database, I found that all 58 current IA carriers had a total of 235 complaints in 2007, averaging just over 4 complaints each. With any single carrier, the complaints ranged from 0 to 95. Interestingly, VA carriers drew a greater number of complaints than IA carriers in the same period on an absolute basis.

    Misconception 4: IAs are illiquid. That’s false. Only 6 of the 344 IAs available today do not offer the option for 10% penalty-free withdrawals annually (many offer it as early as the first year). In addition, 89% of today’s index annuities have some sort of surrender charge waiver, allowing clients to access funds without penalty, say in event of nursing home confinement, disability, terminal illness, unemployment.

    Misconception 3: IAs put the consumer’s money at risk. The only risk to the IA client’s money is if the owner surrenders early, or takes out more than the penalty-free amount. One of the IA’s primary attractions is that it provides principal protection. The funds backing the IA are held in the insurer’s general account, not a separate account (as with securities). Consumers always have the peace of mind of knowing they are protected by the IA’s minimum guarantee. If heaven forbid “something happens” to the insurer, the consumer would be protected by the state guaranty fund—like “sleep insurance!”

    Misconception 2: IAs aren’t regulated. This is absolutely inaccurate. IAs are fixed products, and thus regulated by the individual state insurance departments. To date, 31 states have adopted the Suitability of Annuity Sales model regulation. The American Council of Life Insurers and the National Association of Variable Annuities have worked on a joint annuity disclosure pilot project modeled on the NAIC Annuity Disclosure Model Regulation. Several states require advisors to take additional continuing education to sell annuities, and the state of Iowa specifically requires 4 hours of CE to sell index products. Products must meet strict non-forfeiture testing, marketing material guidelines and other tests that each state sets forth.

    Misconception 1: IAs are complex. That’s anti-IA hype. IAs are just fixed annuities with a different way of crediting interest.

    Originally Posted at National Underwriter on August 19, 2007 by Sheryl J. Moore.

    Categories: Sheryl's Articles
    currency