We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (15,878)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (9)
  • Negative Media (135)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (587)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (166)
  • Wink's Articles (222)
  • Wink's Blogs (209)
  • Wink's Press Releases (92)
  • Blog Archives

  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Index annuities for the “new normal”

    May 4, 2010 by Jack Marrion

    Index annuities may be a simple method of protecting clients from the stock market’s roller-coaster ride. 

    Published 5/1/2010   

    I collect actual index annuity return data. Although not every product and carrier is included, based on the data I have, the average reported index annuity return beat the actual S&P 500 return in 63 percent of actual five-year periods going back to 1997. Overall, if you compare the performance of the average index annuity with an S&P 500 index fund for periods from 1997 through 2009, the index annuity wins.

    However, rather than accept this reality, some index annuity detractors argue that index annuities may have performed well since they were introduced in 1995 but these aren’t normal times. They often then compare the performance of a hypothetical index annuity with an equity investment over the last 30 years and say, “see, in normal times equities beat index annuities.” However, I submit this period is not representative of normalcy either.

    Tracking the differences
    The average annual stock market return over the ’80s and ’90s was 17.6 percent, but Jeremy Siegel of the Wharton School looked at the six decades after World War II and found the average annual stock market return, including reinvested dividends, was 6.83 percent. If you had a fictional annual-reset index annuity that averaged a 50 percent participation rate for the same period, your annualized return would have been 7.13 percent, without reinvested dividends.

    In my modeling of the Great Depression if you could have purchased an index annuity each month beginning in August 1929 with only a 30 percent participation rate, your average annual index annuity return would have been 6.4 percent.

    The ten years following 1972 somewhat resemble the decade after 1999 in stock market movement. In this earlier era, the S&P 500 finished 3.8 percent higher than where it began, but an index-annuity, annual-reset approach would credit interest based on a total period gain of 124 percent.

    What is the benchmark?
    Frankly, I don’t know if the next 10 or 20 years will be like the last, but it appears unlikely that the runaway 1980-2000 period returns should be used as “normal” times. If the next stock market era resembles the broader strokes of the past two centuries it will have frequent peaks and valleys. This type of market is distressing enough when one is building for retirement, but it can be devastating if you are already retired and spending it down. An index annuity is ideal for benefiting from what may be the “new normal” stock market pattern.

    I collect actual index annuity return data. Although not every product and carrier is included, based on the data I have, the average reported index annuity return beat the actual S&P 500 return in 63 percent of actual five-year periods going back to 1997. Overall, if you compare the performance of the average index annuity with an S&P 500 index fund for periods from 1997 through 2009, the index annuity wins.

    However, rather than accept this reality, some index annuity detractors argue that index annuities may have performed well since they were introduced in 1995 but these aren’t normal times. They often then compare the performance of a hypothetical index annuity with an equity investment over the last 30 years and say, “see, in normal times equities beat index annuities.” However, I submit this period is not representative of normalcy either.

    Tracking the differences
    The average annual stock market return over the ’80s and ’90s was 17.6 percent, but Jeremy Siegel of the Wharton School looked at the six decades after World War II and found the average annual stock market return, including reinvested dividends, was 6.83 percent. If you had a fictional annual-reset index annuity that averaged a 50 percent participation rate for the same period, your annualized return would have been 7.13 percent, without reinvested dividends.

    In my modeling of the Great Depression if you could have purchased an index annuity each month beginning in August 1929 with only a 30 percent participation rate, your average annual index annuity return would have been 6.4 percent.

    The ten years following 1972 somewhat resemble the decade after 1999 in stock market movement. In this earlier era, the S&P 500 finished 3.8 percent higher than where it began, but an index-annuity, annual-reset approach would credit interest based on a total period gain of 124 percent.

    What is the benchmark?
    Frankly, I don’t know if the next 10 or 20 years will be like the last, but it appears unlikely that the runaway 1980-2000 period returns should be used as “normal” times. If the next stock market era resembles the broader strokes of the past two centuries it will have frequent peaks and valleys. This type of market is distressing enough when one is building for retirement, but it can be devastating if you are already retired and spending it down. An index annuity is ideal for benefiting from what may be the “new normal” stock market pattern.

    Originally Posted at Senior Market Advisor on May 1, 2010 by Jack Marrion.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency