We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (16,574)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (37)
  • Negative Media (138)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (618)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (175)
  • Wink's Articles (242)
  • Wink's Blogs (258)
  • Wink's Press Releases (93)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • EIAs To Remain State Regulated

    June 25, 2010 by Arthur D. Postal

    Published 6/24/2010 

    Conferees on financial services regulation today agreed to keep equity indexed annuities state-regulated.

    House conferees this afternoon accepted the Senate offer made late Tuesday that would classify fixed indexed annuities as insurance products—if the FIA products are sold by insurers domiciled in states that have adopted the model regulations recently developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, Kansas City, Mo.

    Currently, 40 states have adopted the NAIC suitability model law.

    According to industry data, approximately $30 billion in EIAs are sold annually through the country.

    In response to the action by the conferees, Eric Marhoun, general counsel and senior vice president of the Old Mutual Financial Network, Baltimore, said, “We are pleased the Senate and House Conferees have taken an important step in clarifying the status of these guaranteed insurance products and we support final passage of the measure.”

    A panel of the D.C. Court of Appeals issued a decision last July saying that the agency has the authority to regulate EIAs, but withheld final approval on procedural grounds. Old Mutual had asked in February that the court toss out the regulation, but the court has as yet not responded to that motion.

    The amendment approved by the conferees was sponsored by Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa. Insurers based in Iowa and Minnesota are prime underwriters and marketers of EIAs.

    Under the Harkin amendment, states would retain state-regulation for EIAs if the insurer selling an FIA product has agreed to apply the NAIC standards to all of its FIA sales.

    That means that if the overall bill, H.R. 4173, is passed by the Congress, which is likely to occur sometime next week, the new measure would pre-empt Rule 151A, published by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    Until June 2013, the deadline for states to adopt the NAIC suitability rules, the SEC rule would be preempted in the 12 states that have so far not adopted the NAIC rule through a grandfather clause in the Harkin measure.

    But after June 2013, the SEC rules would apply in the states that do not adopt the NAIC suitability standard, according to the conferees.

    The House action followed a 12-4 decision late Tuesday by Senate conferees.

    The amendment states that EIAs are insurance products that should be overseen by the states.

    Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., ranking minority member of the House Financial Services Committee, said he supported the amendment because he was concerned that because of the way the SEC structured its rule, potentially even life insurance products could eventually be subject to SEC regulation.

    He said the SEC has enough to do and that state regulators did an acceptable job of regulating insurance companies during the recent economic downturn.

    He also argued that leaving EIAs to state regulators provide a “strong incentive” for states that have not adopted the model rule to do so.

    Rep. Scott Garrett, R-N.J., also argued that the SEC rule does not apply a higher standard of regulation on EIAs than the NAIC rule.

    “SEC regulation does not add to the regulation of these products—there is no higher level of regulation,” he said.

    But Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, opposed the preemption provision. He said the SEC rule imposed dual responsibility for regulation of EIAs, by both the SEC and state regulators.

    He also said even some state securities regulators support SEC regulation of EIAs.

    The amendment is narrower than one offered on the Senate floor by Harkin but rejected by the Senate.

    In seeking support of Senate conferees, Harkin said, “This is an insurance product. It always has been and still is today. The Security and Exchange Commission’s got a lot of other things to do than regulate what is now an insurance market.”

    He also defended the instruments as an appropriate investment. “No one has lost their money—period,” Harkin said.

    Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., chairman of the securities subcommittee of the Senate Banking Committee, opposed the reclassification.

    Reed contended during the debate by Senate conferees on the issue that Harkin’s amendment misinterpreted the decision.

    “The Harkin amendment would effectively trump the court’s decision,” Reed said.

    Reed charged that “there have been repeated abuses of this product.” He contended, too, that Harkin’s amendment could not be inserted because it was not contained in the bills passed by the House and Senate.

    “This is a major amendment of securities law without any hearings or debate,” Reed said. “I don’t think this is the proper place to make such a change.”

    Originally Posted at National Underwriter on June 24, 2010 by Arthur D. Postal.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency