Have you truly considered the effect of rider charges on a fixed or indexed annuity?
September 22, 2011 by Sheryl J. Moore
You may be able to sell the sizzle of the roll up on that income or death benefit rider, but can you pass the test when it comes time to explain the ramifications for your client electing it? You need to. Get educated and ensure that you understand the
products you are selling.
“Zero is your hero!” The words that captured my heart. As a young saver who had lost more than a year’s salary in my 401(k), the promise of earning no interest sounded pretty darn good. Sure, the ability to outpace the interest on CDs and other fixed interest retirement products was appealing to me, but suffering the losses of the dot com bubble’s burst had soured me.
I just couldn’t justify taking an additional risk with my retirement dollars by keeping it in my newly-acquired “201(k).” It was then, in my search for a safe money alternative, that I met the love of my life: indexed annuities.
At the time, the product offered a strong value proposition. I could purchase an indexed annuity for my retirement and earn interest based on the market’s growth — as much as 12 percent or more in a single year!
I realized I couldn’t take advantage of the full increase in the market with indexed annuities; I knew the market-linked gains were limited. However, the real clincher for me was the promise that “regardless of the market’s performance, my retirement fund’s value would never be less than the previous year.”
Never less? That’s right — indexed annuities promised zero percent interest as the worst-case scenario. It was a match made in heaven.
And just as indexed annuities and I were passing the “seven-year itch,” my heart broke.
In 2006, the indexed annuity market changed forever. It was at this time that the introduction of optional riders/benefits changed fixed and indexed annuity landscapes. This pivotal moment marked the occasion when the first guaranteed minimum death benefit was introduced on an indexed annuity, in exchange for an annual fee. Neither the fixed or indexed variety of annuities had previously offered such a feature, yet riders with fees were commonplace in the variable annuity market.
Then again, with average annual fees on VAs exceeding 4.5 percent, tacking on another benefit for a fee as not that noteworthy on this risk-based type of annuity.
Take a product with principal protection, on the other hand, and introduce a VA-like
feature, now that is a game changer. In fact, GMDBs permanently altered the
insurance agent’s communication of the indexed annuity product. No longer could
one assert that in the worst case scenario, your retirement fund’s value will be
the same that it was last year.
No. Now, you actually could lose money in an indexed annuity — even if the client did not cash surrender the contract. And GMDBs were just the beginning. With the introduction of guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefits shortly thereafter, fees
for optional benefits become commonplace on both indexed and fixed annuities.
Consider: Today, nearly 60 percent of all indexed annuity sales have an optional GLWB elected on the contract. The vast majority of these riders charge an annual fee in exchange for the benefit.
Did you, as an agent selling these benefits, realize that you can no longer say that your client’s annuities will never decline in value, as long as they don’t take withdrawals?
Let me thicken the plot. Did you realize that an indexed annuity with an optional fee-based GLWB or GMDB doesn’t offer a guaranteed return of principal much less a guaranteed return of principal, plus interest?
With less than five exceptions, every one of these riders can eat into the principal on the contract. So, if the S&P 500 were to decline every year of the surrender charge period, your clients will still be paying a charge for that rider, and that means that they will get back less than what they paid in, if they decide to cash surrender the contract. Did you know that? I hope so.
Let’s complicate the issue even further. What if the product that you are selling has rider fees that cannot only invade the principal of the annuity, but can also eat into the guaranteed minimum surrender value on the contract?
You know, the value that essentially says that in order to be compliant with the National Association of Insurance Commissioner’s standard non-forfeiture laws, the policyholder must never receive less than 1 percent interest on 87.5 percent of the premiums paid?
How could an insurance company offer such a product, if it isn’t compliant with the SNFL, you ask? You got me. Yet, there is such an indexed annuity that is available for
sale today. I hope you know it, if you are selling it to your clients today.
Let me continue to play devil’s advocate here. With the recent ramp-up in GMDB product development, this particular issue comes to the forefront of my mind. We are now able to create a “cafeteria plan” type of retirement product with indexed annuities.
Need a rider offering higher caps? Here you go. And an enhanced death benefit with
your order? Sure, we’ve got those too. How about a side of GLWB to go with that?
You bet. That will be a total of 2.5 percent of your annuity’s account value annually, please. Do you prefer paper or plastic? You get the idea.
But this is a fixed annuity, folks, not a VA! Now, I’ve always told agents if they are going to sell a GLWB or a GMDB on the contract, they need to allocate at least a little of the policyholder’s premiums to the fixed bucket of the indexed annuity. This helps avoid that uncomfortable conversation about why the annuity’s value is less than the previous year when the S&P 500 has experienced a downturn.
Considering that fixed rates are normally in the 2 percent range, and rider charges typically didn’t exceed 0.75 percent — this little workaround allowed us to forego that uncomfortable conversation.
But what if the total fees for all of the annuity’s optional benefits exceed the rate on the fixed bucket? Now there’s something to think about … and you should — because total fees on optional indexed annuity riders today can exceed 2.5 percent annually, yet I have fixed buckets crediting as low as 1 percent.
Listen, folks, I love GLWBs — I developed the dang things. And I’ve got nothing against providing enhanced death benefits on annuities for those who cannot obtain life insurance.
However, everyone needs to get more educated on this issue. You may be able to sell the sizzle of the roll up on that income or death benefit rider, but can you pass the test when it comes time to explain the ramifications for your client electing it?
You need to. Get educated and ensure that you understand the products you are selling.