We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,890)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (36)
  • Moore on the Market (472)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (823)
  • Wink's Articles (371)
  • Wink's Inside Story (280)
  • Wink's Press Releases (127)
  • Blog Archives

  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • MetLife's $1.6 Billion Annuity Charge Linked to Regulatory Concern

    November 5, 2012 by Leslie Scism

    11/01/2012| 10:37am US/Eastern

       By Leslie Scism
    
    

    MetLife Inc. (>> Metlife Inc) said its $1.6 billion “impairment” charge to reduce the value of annuity operations recorded on its balance sheet stems partly from probes by New York and other state regulators into whether insurers are potentially masking their financial health through dealings with related companies.

    It is the first indication that regulators’ concerns, which have been previously reported, may be having an effect on how the industry operates.

    MetLife, which is one of the biggest sellers of annuities, has been trying to reduce sales of certain types of the products, which are tax-advantaged retirement-savings vehicles, while aiming to ramp up sales of more-basic life-insurance policies. Those life-insurance efforts include a pilot project to sell small term-life policies through Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (>> Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.) in a couple of states.

    MetLife said its fourth-quarter sales of “variable” annuities are running “meaningfully below” the third quarter, which themselves represented a 46% decline from the same period a year earlier. Variable annuities allow buyers to invest in stock and bond funds and typically include a guarantee of lifetime income, even if the funds tank.

    A MetLife executive said in an earnings conference call with analysts and investors Thursday that the company’s use of related entities as part of its claims-reserving structure for various products is proper and “conservatively” run.

    But the company said the regulatory investigations play into how insurers’ businesses are valued in the marketplace, and such valuations are taken into account when assessing how businesses are valued on a company’s balance sheet.

    MetLife, the nation’s biggest life insurer by assets, swung to a third-quarter loss as it recorded a hefty impairment charge tied to certain annuity businesses it acquired in past years. The New York insurer posted a loss of $954 million, compared with year-earlier quarterly profit of $3.46 billion.

    A big factor in the impairment is the ultralow interest-rate environment, which cuts into the profitability of annuities in various ways, analysts said.

    MetLife Chief Financial Officer John Hele said MetLife runs its offshore captive “conservatively,” but the company believes the investigations help damp the valuation of businesses by making potential buyers “more cautious” about continued use of the structures in their current form.

    New York’s Department of Financial Services in July sent letters to insurers, including MetLife, seeking details about their financial arrangements with affiliated entities, known as captives, as previously reported. In addition, a group of state regulators at the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, an organization that sets solvency standards for adoption by states, is examining the structures.

    Many of the entities are incorporated in Vermont or other states that have encouraged their use. They are set up specifically to take on responsibility for certain types of policyholder claims from their parent companies. Regulators are looking for potential risks in these “reinsurance” transactions, they have said.

    Under many of the arrangements, including one at MetLife since 2008, the related entity has obtained a letter of credit from a major bank, which is committed to providing money if needed for paying future claims.

    Meanwhile, William Wheeler, president of MetLife’s Americas division, said the company would hit its target of limiting variable-annuity sales to $18 billion for the year. Through the first three quarters, sales were about $14 billion.

    Mr. Wheeler said the variable annuities MetLife is selling now represent a “pretty attractive business” for the company, with a 14% return on investment.

    “Today’s sales are profitable,” he said. But the company wants to restrain sales because “we can’t let it get too big relative to MetLife.”

    Separately, company executives highlighted an initiative to sell term-life policies at Wal-Mart stores. Chief Executive Steven Kandarian said the effort is in its “early days,” citing it as one of the ways MetLife “is going to innovate” to sell products to consumers who may not buy through life-insurance agents.

    “Perhaps we as an industry haven’t made it easy enough for people” to buy insurance, he said.

    Under the initiative, consumers can pay for a small policy at the check-out counter. The consumer then calls MetLife to answer health questions, at which point the policy would be activated or denied. If denied, the purchaser would be refunded his or her purchase price.

    MetLife also has been promoting Internet-based sales of basic life insurance.

    -Erik Holm contributed to this article

    Write to Leslie Scism at leslie.scism@wsj.com

    Originally Posted at The Wall Street Journal on November 1, 2012 by Leslie Scism.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency