We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,052)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (408)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (799)
  • Wink's Articles (346)
  • Wink's Inside Story (272)
  • Wink's Press Releases (121)
  • Blog Archives

  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) Update: Spring 2013 Meeting

    May 20, 2013 by Daniel W. Krane James C. McMeen Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

    The National Association of  Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) held its Spring 2013 National Meeting from April 6 to 9 in Houston, Texas.  This update provides a brief  overview of  the activities of  certain NAIC working groups that focus on issues affecting retirement income products and their providers.

    Contingent Deferred Annuity

    (A) Working Group

    As discussed in our October 2012 newsletter, the Contingent Deferred Annuity (A) Working Group (CDA Group) was established to evaluate the adequacy of  existing laws and regulations applicable to solvency and consumer protection issues in connection with contingent deferred annuities (CDAs).  CDAs are a type of  annuity contract that provides guaranteed lifetime income payments if  designated investments not owned or held by the insurer are depleted due to permitted withdrawals, poor market performance, fees or other charges.

    At the meeting, the CDA Group heard presentations from various regulators, industry and trade groups, consumer representatives, and other interested parties.  In particular, a representative from the American Council of  Life Insurers commented that the suitability rules of  the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) do apply to sales of  CDAs by brokers and, therefore, the Suitability in Annuity Transactions Model Regulation (#275) (Model Suitability Regulation) should not also apply because such application would result in two suitability reviews.  In response, the CDA Group was of  the view that FINRA does not apply its variable annuity suitability rules to CDAs, only its general suitability rules, which do not provide the same protections as the Suitability Model Regulation.  Accordingly, the CDA Group recommended to the Life Insurance and Annuities (A) Committee (A Committee) that the Model Suitability Regulation be revised to specifically reference the sale of  CDAs and make clear that certain training and product specific training requirements include CDAs.

    In response to comments from several other insurance regulators regarding reserve requirements for CDAs, the CDA Group recommended to the A Committee that analyzing reserving requirements for CDAs should be referred to an NAIC Working Group with the appropriate subject matter expertise. A representative from the Insured Retirement Institute commented that the CDA Group should make clear that the states do not have to wait until after the CDA Group and A Committee complete their work on CDAs before approving them.  The CDA Group did not include this suggestion in its final report and recommendations to the A Committee.

    Finally, the CDA Group also heard a presentation from the Executive Director of  the Center for Economic Justice who urged the CDA Group to make clear in its report and recommendations that it was not endorsing CDAs and who advised the CDA Group that states may have approved CDAs without realizing that they were CDAs and should re-examine and, if  appropriate, re-approve such products.  The CDA Group considered these recommendations beyond the scope of  its charge and did not include them in its report and recommendations to the A Committee.

    The A Committee adopted the CDA Group’s final report and recommendations.  A copy of  the report is available here: http://www.naic.org/meetings1304/committees_a_2013_spring_nm_additional_…

    Annuity Disclosure (A) Working Group

    The A Committee appointed the Annuity Disclosure (A) Working Group (Annuity Disclosure Working Group) to consider changes to the NAIC Annuity Disclosure Model Regulation to improve the disclosure of  information provided for annuity products and to provide insurance companies with uniform guidance on developing disclosure practices and monitoring the distribution of  annuities.  The Annuity Disclosure Working Group’s 2013 charge was to review and revise the NAIC Buyer’s Guides (Buyer’s Guides) which are consumer guides setting forth a general explanation of  deferred annuities and fixed deferred annuities and some of  their most common features.  The model regulation requires that the Buyer’s Guides (as applicable) be delivered, along with an annuity disclosure document, to each prospective applicant for an annuity contract.

    The Annuity Disclosure Working Group had previously discussed revisions to the Buyer’s Guides on a teleconference call on March 22, 2013 and, at the meeting, approved a slightly revised version of  the Buyer’s Guides incorporating additional technical, non-substantive changes.  The Annuity Disclosure Working Group submitted the revised Buyer’s Guides to the A Committee, which approved them as well as the re-appointment of  the group to complete its work developing interactive electronic versions of  the Buyer’s Guides for posting on insurance company websites.

    The final versions of  the Buyer’s Guides are available here: http://www.naic.org/meetings1304/committees_a_2013_spring_nm_materials.pdf

    ERISA Retirement Income

    (A) Working Group

    The 2013 charge of  the ERISA Retirement Income (A) Working Group (Retirement Income Group) was to work with representatives of  the Department of  Labor (DOL), the White House Council of  Economic Advisors, the Department of  the Treasury, and any other appropriate federal agencies, in coordination with the NAIC Government Relations Leadership Council, to consider possible options for easing plan sponsor concerns with the financial soundness of  annuity providers as related to the DOL safe harbor for satisfying fiduciary responsibility requirements in selecting annuity providers.  For more information about the DOL safe harbor, see our October 2012 newsletter.

    At the meeting, the Retirement Income Group heard a presentation from the Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company on the different types of  ERISA plans and taxqualified plans.  The group also heard a presentation from the National Organization of  Life & Health Guaranty Association on the insurance guaranty system, the context in which it operates, and how core commitments of  guaranty funds to consumers are honored when insurers become insolvent.

    The Retirement Income Group concluded the meeting by agreeing to hold conference calls prior to the NAIC’s Summer 2013 National Meeting to continue to work on its charge.  The A Committee adopted the report of  the Retirement Income Group, which has not yet been made publicy available.

    ERISA (B) Working Group

    The ERISA (B) Working Group (ERISA B Group) reports to the Regulatory Framework (B) Task Force (B Task Force) which, in turn, reports to the Health Insurance and Managed Care (B) Committee.  The ERISA B Group’s 2013 charges were to (i) monitor, report, and analyze developments related to ERISA and make recommendations regarding NAIC strategy and policy with respect to those developments, (ii) develop a white paper analyzing the potential impact of  small employer self-insurance on the small group market beginning in 2014, and (iii) review and revise the Stop Loss Insurance Model Act (#92) to take into account medical inflation.

    At the meeting, the ERISA B Group discussed surveying the states sometime in May to determine what, if  anything, is occurring in the small group market in light of  2014 market reforms.  Noting that state health insurance exchanges would not be fully operational until 2014, the ERISA B Group decided to postpone the state survey until 2014 and issue a white paper later that year, once the states and the working group have a better understanding of  the impact, if  any, of  the health insurance exchanges on the small group market.  For example, the ERISA B Group acknowledged that it could not fully analyze the impact of  the exchanges until it was known which insurance companies and insurance products would be offered on the exchanges.  The ERISA B Group also agreed to review existing literature on the impact of  small group employer self-insurance on the goals of  The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.

    Such literature may inform, or possibly obviate altogether the need for, the white paper.  The ERISA B Group also briefly discussed the ability of  states to possibly prohibit stop-loss coverage when the attachment point is too low.

    Finally, the group discussed its plan to continue review of  the NAIC ERISA Handbook for possible modifications.The B Task Force approved the re-appointment of  the ERISA B Group and its report.  A copy of  the group’s report is available here:

    http://www.naic.org/meetings1304/committees_b_2013_spring_nm_materials.pdf

    ©2013 Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP. All Rights Reserved

    Originally Posted at National Law Review on May 18, 2013 by Daniel W. Krane James C. McMeen Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency