We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,131)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (413)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (799)
  • Wink's Articles (352)
  • Wink's Inside Story (273)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • NAIC Panel Battles over Interim Plan to Keep Triple-X, AXXX Life Reserves Intact

    December 17, 2013 by Thomas Harman

    WASHINGTON – The ultimate fate of whether two reserving tools used by some life insurers should be eliminated from use continues to be the subject of vigorous debate among some state regulators who are pushing the concept and life insurers — as well as some state regulators — who believe the controversial tools can still be useful under a principles-based reserving system.

    The principles-based reserving working group deliberated on how to proceed at the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ Fall National Meeting in Washington, featuring debate about possibly developing a framework that would allow for the continued use of those types of reserves at least until principles-based reserving is ratified by states.

    The panel was formed after NAIC in 2012 approved an amendment to the valuation manual containing principles-based reserving that put the topic up for ratification by state lawmakers (Best’s News Service, Dec. 3, 2012). Supporters of the approach say PBR was necessary to lessen redundant reserves in the XXX and AXXX reserving tools that companies selling term-life and universal life insurance with secondary guarantees have used.

    In mid-September, the panel received a Rector & Associates report that offered the panel two alternatives on how to proceed, including one that allowed the reserving tools to continue under a reinsurance ceding arrangement that must meet several criteria, and another that would allow an insurer to have the same impact, but without using reinsurance. Rector & Associates founder Neil Rector — a former deputy director in the Ohio Department of Insurance — noted a division on the fate of the reserves among the task force during his research and sought more guidance.

    Panel co-chairman Joseph Torti, Rhode Island’s insurance commissioner, said some members on the task force who wanted to see the XXX and AXXX plans continue in some form and some members of the task force who wanted a moratorium placed against them. Torti put himself in the camp of those who believe XXX and AXXX plans should be ultimately be eliminated, but said it was unlikely.

    But Vermont Insurance Commissioner Susan Donegan said that while the status quo should not remain, Vermont is comfortable continuing these types of special purpose vehicles because “it’s something we understand the nuances of.”

    Currently, the panel is considering creating an actuarial standard that would create an interim alternative threshold under which XXX and AXXX could still be used, at least on an interim basis until principles-based reserving is ratified by 42 states that must also have 75% of all life premiums. Currently, only seven states have ratified its use. Among the ideas under consideration as perhaps an interim standard is Valuation Manual 20, which Rector identified as being an idea nobody would choose first.

    Some industry officials differ with using an interim reserving standard such as VM-20. Paul Graham of the American Council of Life Insurers said considering capital standards would be the best approach. He said an alternative standard threshold should be set “close to where [principles-based reserving] could be.” He asked that the panel consider capital or reserving standards before moving ahead.

    Torti said he sensed no real opposition among task force members to ultimately stop the use of XXX and AXXX reserving, but admitted there were some key issues to address. “It’s still a little bit up in the air,” he said.

    (By Thomas Harman, associate editor, BestWeek: Tom.Harman@ambest.com)

    Originally Posted at AM Best on December 16, 2013 by Thomas Harman.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency