We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (16,283)
  • Industry Conferences (3)
  • Industry Job Openings (9)
  • Negative Media (138)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (605)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (171)
  • Wink's Articles (235)
  • Wink's Blogs (216)
  • Wink's Press Releases (94)
  • Blog Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • New rules for annuities and target date funds inspire products race

    October 31, 2014 by Darla Mercado

     

    Retirement plan service providers are revving up their product development engines now that the Treasury and Labor departments are paving the way for annuities to be paired with target date funds in 401(k) plans.

    Plan service providers have long awaited guidance from regulators on whether plan sponsors can use these products as qualified default investment alternatives. For instance, BlackRock’s LifePath Retirement Income — which paired target date funds with deferred income annuities from MetLife Inc. — was launched about seven years ago. But lack of regulatory clarity on whether plan sponsors could use such products, along with other concerns, kept it and other products from taking off, noted Chip Castille, head of BlackRock’s U.S. Retirement Group.

    “Fortunately, at least with this kind of product, those issues are something we can now address,” he said. “We have guidance on how it can work in a QDIA. We can have a more constructive conversation today.”

    “We’ve been working on it intensely for the last month or two months,” said Bob Reynolds, president and chief executive of Great-West Financial and Putnam Investments. The company took a closer look at deferred annuities after the Treasury and IRS issued initial guidance in July to make it easier for plan participants to buy deferred income annuities that begin payout as late as age 85.

    Meanwhile, last Thursday, Phyllis C. Borzi, assistant secretary at the Department of Labor, wrote a letter to J. Mark Iwry, senior adviser to the Treasury secretary, clarifying that target date funds’ investment in unallocated deferred annuity contracts as fixed income investments would permit those funds to meet the requirements necessary to make them qualified default investment alternatives in a retirement plan.

    Per Treasury’s memo, in order for safe harbor to apply to the plan sponsor, he or she must choose the investment manager and the target date fund. Acting as a fiduciary, the investment manager must then choose the insurer providing the annuity. Both the investment manager and the insurer must be independent from each other.

    Lincoln National Corp. is already working to address the issue of keeping investment managers separate from itself as an insurer. The insurer offers guaranteed withdrawal benefits — which aren’t addressed in the Treasury’s latest memo — in connection with target date funds.

    Third-party advisers and consultants who act as fiduciary investment managers can craft their own fund line-up elsewhere or work with a fiduciary like Ibbotson Associates, and use guaranteed features offered by Lincoln, according to Bob Melia, vice president of product development at Lincoln’s retirement plan services unit.

    Though the Treasury, IRS and DOL’s latest guidance makes it easier for plans to incorporate annuities as a part of their plan line-up, experts note that there is room for further clarification from additional guidance.

    For one thing, the fact that the investment manager is responsible for selecting the insurer takes a weight off the shoulders of employers.

    “That addresses a concern that plan sponsors have had for a long time: ‘What is our liability for choosing the provider if they don’t meet the payments down the road?’” said Bradford P. Campbell, counsel at Drinker Biddle Reath LLP and former assistant secretary of labor.

    But other questions remain. Mr. Campbell noted that the DOL’s guidance outlining the safe harbor as it applies to annuity selection seems subjective. For instance, those who choose the provider must “appropriately consider” the cost of the contract and the information sufficient to assess whether the provider can make payments.

    “It’s hard to know whether you comply with the safe harbor and [whether] you are protected by it,” Mr. Campbell said.

    There’s also the issue of what the pricing will look like, noted Marcia Wagner, managing director at the Wagner Law Group. “Will there be significantly different pricing depending on the age and age groups?” she asked. “What if people want to distribute their savings earlier than expected? Will there be a price adjustment?”

    Finally, the guidance provided last week only applies to deferred income annuities, in which buyers pay premiums in the present in order to receive income many years into the future. Guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits and guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefits are excluded from the guidance at the moment.

    Treasury and the IRS are still weighing whether to provide guidance on the use of these features in defined contribution plans.

     

    Originally Posted at InvestmentNews on October 30, 2014 by Darla Mercado.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency