We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (22,107)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (3)
  • Moore on the Market (495)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (828)
  • Wink's Articles (377)
  • Wink's Inside Story (284)
  • Wink's Press Releases (129)
  • Blog Archives

  • December 2024
  • November 2024
  • October 2024
  • September 2024
  • August 2024
  • July 2024
  • June 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Regulators Give Annuities a Green Light for Retirement

    October 30, 2014 by Jeff Holt

    The Treasury issued guidance supporting the use of deferred annuities in target-date funds.

    Why does this matter to investors?

    As the retirement landscape has shifted investors from the predictable payments of defined-benefit plans to the relative uncertainty of saving for their own retirements via defined-contribution plans, plan sponsors and industry practitioners have sought to combine aspects of both worlds: provide investors with guaranteed income and still give them flexibility with their assets. The U.S. Department of Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service issued guidance on Oct. 24, 2014, that paves the way for strategies designed to help 401(k) participants accumulate a guaranteed income stream within a defined-contribution plan.

    The Treasury’s guidance is potentially momentous. In some ways it resembles the Department of Labor’s Pension Protection Act of 2006, which opened the floodgates for target-date funds by naming them a Qualified Default Investment Alternative. Plan sponsors receive safe harbor protection when defaulting participants do not make an investment election into a QDIA, and target-date funds have emerged as the predominant QDIA. As a result, those investments have seen significant inflows over much of the past decade and now receive the preponderance of new retirement savings assets. Similarly, this guidance emboldens plan sponsors to pursue a groundbreaking investment for their 401(k) investors.

    As outlined in an example, the guidance (Notice 2014-66) allows target-date funds to purchase deferred annuities with a portion of investors’ assets beginning at age 55. An investor’s allocation to these annuities increases until reaching age 65. At that time, the investor receives a certificate stating his claim to annuity payments. The Treasury received confirmation from the Department of Labor that target-date funds with deferred annuities still meet QDIA requirements, raising the potential for this new breed of target-date funds to reach a vast audience in relatively short order. Interestingly, the Treasury explicitly states that the Notice does not cover two specific solutions, namely target-date funds with a guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefit or a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit. Investors in these solutions pay an explicit cost to an insurer in return for a guaranteed payment that continues even if they deplete their assets. The Treasury has not yet decided if it will provide guidance on these solutions.

    Not in the Clear Yet

    401(k) investors should not expect target-date funds with deferred annuities to crop up in plan lineups just yet, though. Interested plan sponsors must first gain comfort with the idea and then go through the process of evaluating the universe of potential alternatives as they come to market. The inclusion of insurers adds an extra wrinkle to that process. Also, plan record keepers may need time to develop the ability to administer this type of strategy and to make it portable for investors who may see multiple job changes and retirement plans before they retire. Both of these hurdles can be expected to delay, or possibly even derail, the adoption of target-date funds with deferred annuities. While annuities could improve retirement outcomes, as these strategies surface, plan sponsors and investors should be aware of the costs and counterparty risk–the risk that the insurance company fails to make payments–that accompany them.

    Providing Clarity

    The Notice serves to alleviate 401(k) plan sponsors’ concerns with offering target-date funds that include deferred annuities. Click here for the Treasury’s summary press release and here for the notice itself.

    The Notice clarifies that plan sponsors may offer target-date funds with built-in deferred annuities to a subset of its participants without infringing on nondiscrimination requirements. The target-date series must be available to all plan participants, but the funds that include deferred annuities may be limited to older participants. This addresses concerns that a plan sponsor would be discriminating against some of its workers by offering deferred annuities exclusively to older, typically higher-paid participants.

    In response to the Treasury’s request, the Department of Labor confirmed its view that target-date funds’ holding of deferred annuities does not preclude them from meeting the requirements of a QDIA. Click here to read the DOL’s letter.

    Originally Posted at MorningStar on October 28, 2014 by Jeff Holt.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency