We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,244)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (422)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (804)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Financial Advisors Haven’t Bridged The Gender Wage Gap

    March 5, 2015 by Cyril Tuohy, cyril.tuohy@innfeedback.com

    The worst-paying job for women in the U.S. is that of financial advisor. Let’s just repeat that and let it sink in: The worst-paying job for women in the U.S. is that of financial advisor.

    Before heading for the exits to wage another skirmish in the gender wars, perhaps we should qualify that statement.

    The financial advisory profession is the worst-paying job for women when compared with what men earn in the same position, according to 24/7 Wall Street, using the most recent data based on the Current Population Survey from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS).

    So, yes, the financial advisory profession is the worst-paying job for women but only in relative terms, not absolute terms.

    Among financial advisors, women earned only 61.3 percent of what men earned last year, according to the 24/7 Wall Street analysis, a disparity that that harks back to levels last seen in the 1970s.

    On average, the wage gap for all occupations was much narrower as women made 82.5 percent of what men earned in 2014, according to the findings.

    Ariane Hegewisch, a study director at the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, which was not involved in the latest 24/7 Wall Street research, said that when it comes to income, women financial advisors trail their male counterparts to an extent.

    Among financial advisors, the earnings ratio between men and women often fluctuates from one year to the next, but in 2014 the earnings gap for financial advisors was especially low, she said.

    “It’s staggering that (the wage gap) is changing so slowly, especially because there have been attempts to deal with bias in the distribution of accounts,” Hegewisch told InsuranceNewsNet.

    “We were pretty taken aback and if you look at class actions, you’d think it would change because large firms were involved,” she added.

    BLS data indicate there were 335,000 workers employed in the financial advisor profession with median weekly earnings of $1,337, a figure that doesn’t include self-employment.

    Male financial advisors, of which there were 201,000 in 2014, earned $1,637 a week. Women, of which there were 134,000 in 2014, collected $1,004 a week.

    Hegewisch said the financial advisory profession has always been an occupation with one of the widest wage gaps. Previous surveys have shown women earning 65 percent or even 67 percent of what men make, but it’s “always below 70 (percent),” she said.

    Still, “this year it’s particularly low,” Hegewisch added.

    Susan L. Combs, president of Women in Insurance and Financial Services (WIFS), said the results were unexpected.

    “I was surprised by that but I’m also wondering what the pool was,” Combs said in an interview with InsuranceNewsNet.

    Outcomes could have been skewed, she said, particularly if they measured income generated by women who find themselves in administrative and support roles.

    Those roles, while they may qualify as financial advising for statistical purposes in the eyes of the Labor Department, don’t really qualify as a financial advisor or producer, she said.

    Women financial advisors make “a heck of a lot more” than the $1,004 a week indicated in the survey, said Combs, president of the insurance brokerage Combs & Co. in New York City.

    “If you’re earning $52,000 in Missouri, you’re doing all right, but in New York City $52,000 puts you in a support role, not a production role”

    Pay gaps generally are wider in traditionally high-paying occupations. Similar to those occupations, revenue generated by a financial advisor is contingent on commissions, bonuses and merit pay, and sometimes all three.

    But with commission rates for financial advisors more or less equal, whether men or a women close the sale, the wage differential between the sexes in the financial advisor profession is still very high.

    Karen Roberts, former WIFS president and financial advisor with Emerald Financial Group in Deerfield Beach, Fla., called the differential “a ridiculous number considering that we all have the potential to make the same amount of money.”

    “I wonder if the difference is that more women work in corporate and men are more independent and get higher payouts because men want to be entrepreneurial and women are scared,” Roberts said.

    “If I sell a product, I get paid the same (as a man). But depending on who I work for, that changes the percentage payout.”

    Roberts also said the earnings gap could be due to women not working as much as men because of family obligations such as children or elderly parents. It also could be due to the fact that women still don’t negotiate contracts for themselves as favorably as men do, which means women often settle for less.

    Still, a nearly 40 percent difference between what women and men make is a big difference, no matter how commissions, bonuses and merit pay are calculated.

    “Women need to become better negotiators and pay attention to what they are making or not making,” Roberts said.

    Despite the “horrible” gender gap numbers, Roberts said the financial advisory profession remains as good a match as any for women because the profession ultimately rewards hard work, yet allows for the flexibility that many women look for in life.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on March 5, 2015 by Cyril Tuohy, cyril.tuohy@innfeedback.com.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency