We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,244)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (422)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (804)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Some Annuity Carriers Jousted For Position In 2014

    March 20, 2015 by Linda Koco, linda.koco@innfeedback.com

    The 2014 individual annuity company ranking list is out from LIMRA Secure Retirement Institute (LIMRA SRI). That’s a big deal for annuity professionals, even if it’s “just data.” The reason is that the data reveal telltale signs of trends that impact everyday business. For instance, while carriers experienced moderate changes in rankings overall, they all but jousted for position in the fixed annuity sector.

    We unpack some of the findings here.

    In 2014, Jackson National took first place in on combined sales of variable and fixed annuities, with production of more than $24.5 billion. AIG took second place with combined sales of more than $18.9 billion, and Lincoln Financial Group took third place on combined results of more than $15.5 billion.

    Noteworthy: These same carriers held the same rankings in combined variable/fixed annuity sales in 2013. Only one other carrier in 2014 did the same, but its rank was in the bottom half of the top 20.

    LIMRA SRI publishes the combined results for the top 20 every year along with the top 20 writers of variable annuities and top 20 in fixed annuities. The 2014 list is here, and the 2013 list is here.

    Head-turning

    The stay-at-the-top power of Jackson, AIG and Lincoln is head-turning in light of the fact that 13 other carriers saw their top 20 positions change in 2014. In addition, three companies from the 2013 list are not on the 2014 list, so three others took their places.

    Those results might make it seem as if there was a lot of turbulence in ranks four through 20, but not all rank changes have significant impact on the marketplace.

    For instance, five carriers saw their ranks drop by only one or two positions in 2014 based on combined sales, although one did drop by three positions. On the up side, five saw their ranking rise by one or two positions.

    Those are the earmarks of a mildly competitive marketplace, not of one that sets off major sparks. That seems to align with the combined sales results for 2014. According to LIMRA SRI, total annuity sales hit $235.8 billion in 2014, up by just 3 percent from the previous year. Not bad at all considering economic conditions, but not phenomenal either.

    The year did produce a couple of big changes in rank. These always get attention. Allianz Life is one such company. In 2014, it jumped five positions over the previous year to reach fourth place on combined sales of more than $14.9 billion. Much of this was due to the strength of its index annuity sales, which soared throughout the year.

    The other big change was at MetLife. It dropped by five positions to 10th place in 2014. This came as no surprise to annuity professionals, or to the company. That’s because the carrier had signaled, well in advance, that it would be scaling back while it derisks.

    Interestingly, in first quarter 2015, the company made a move that suggests the scaling-back days may be ending. It rolled out a new guaranteed lifetime withdrawal benefit rider for its variable annuities, along with commentary about wanting to be more competitive in the variable annuity living benefits market.

    Variable annuity carriers

    As noted earlier, LIMRA SRI also reports individual annuity sales rankings for the top 20 in variable annuities and top 20 in fixed annuities. Analysis of those figures for 2014 versus 2013 shows the variable annuity rankings track somewhat with the combined rankings, but with less shuffling around among carriers. Meanwhile, the fixed annuity rankings show a lot of shifts, some of them in the “big” category.

    We’ll take the variable annuity market first. Two of 2014’s top three variable annuity carriers took the same ranking they held in 2013: Jackson National came in first on variable sales of nearly $23.1 billion, and Lincoln Financial came in second on sales of nearly $13.1. AIG moved up to third place, from fourth last year, on 2014 sales of more than $12.7 billion.

    Significantly, seven other variable carriers also ranked in the same position as they held in 2013, making for nearly half (nine) position-holders in all, year-over-year. In addition, eight variable carriers moved only one position — five up and three down. One variable carrier did move up three positions, though, and one dropped by four positions.

    Altogether, the variable annuity rankings suggest the business had a lot of predictability last year, with carriers keeping on and competing moderately.

    Compared to the rash of market shifts, moratoriums, cutbacks and related upheaval in the variable annuity business during the post-recession period, 2014 might be viewed as a year that gave producers a breather. However, variable annuity sales got a breather too, falling by 4 percent to $140.1 billion, according to LIMRA SRI figures.

    Fixed annuity carriers

    The rankings on the fixed side of the individual annuity business reveal a lot of change, including some big reversals in year-over-year positions. The LIMRA SRI numbers include all types of fixed annuities —traditional deferred, index, deferred income, immediate income, etc.

    In this market, the top three players all shifted position: Allianz moved up one to take first place on sales of nearly $12.8 billion. New York Life dropped one to take second place on sales of more than $7.5 billion, and AIG moved up one to take third, on sales of more than $6.2 billion.

    In fact, position shift was in high gear in the 2014 fixed market. For instance four carriers moved down by four or more spots (one of them down by 10 positions), and two moved up significantly (by seven and nine positions). As for less dramatic moves, four carriers moved up either one or two spots (including Allianz and AIG, as mentioned earlier); five carriers moved down one or two spots, and one carrier moved down three spots. In addition, two new carriers appear on the 2014 list that were not there last year.

    Only two fixed annuity carriers had no changes in position from 2013.

    So there was a lot of jostling around in the fixed business. But there was also significant growth. Overall fixed annuity sales rose by 13 percent over 2013, according to LIMRA SRI. That was on sales of $95.7 billion.

    A lot of that growth came from index annuity sales, which at $48.2 billion were 23 percent higher than in 2013, the researcher said. Sales of income annuities contributed too, with immediate income annuity sales totaling $9.7 billion (up 17 percent from 2013) and deferred income annuity sales totaling $2.7 billion (up 22 percent from 2013).

    All of this suggests that the sales ranking game can be a lot more rough-and-tumble for annuity carriers than many people realize. A staid, predictable climate helps carriers keep their rankings or even gain a rank or two, as in the variable market last year. But a highly competitive market blows through the established order, creating new leaders and followers, with few carriers left untouched.

    Originally Posted at InsuranceNewsNet on March 18, 2015 by Linda Koco, linda.koco@innfeedback.com.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency