We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,244)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (422)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (804)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Planning Today: Getting There and Getting Through

    November 2, 2015 by David Laster

    How retirement income-adequacy is being redefined

     

    Of the myriad financial risks related to retirement, top of mind for many clients is the risk of outliving their wealth. A recent Society of Actuaries survey found that nearly two in three pre-retirees expressed concern over the prospect of depleting their savings in retirement.

    This apprehension reflects an erosion of the “three-legged stool” of retirement: Social Security, employer pensions and private savings.

    • Social Security faces growing stress as the ratio of workers paying into the system to retirees collecting benefits continues to decline. Cost may be contained in the future by reducing benefits, raising the retirement age or further taxing benefits.

    • Recent accounting rule changes make traditional defined benefit plans more expensive for employers, hastening their disappearance.

    • The two devastating market sell-offs of the past 15 years have sharply reduced the life savings of many retirees.

    Faced with these challenges, Baby Boomers must manage their savings to last a lifetime and perhaps to leave something for the next generation. Many clients find this a daunting challenge.

    Longevity risk

    Living longer presents tremendous personal opportunities for our clients, but also heightens their longevity risk – the risk of outliving their wealth. While it is well known that people today are living longer than ever before, few appreciate the magnitude and implications of this trend. For a couple, both age 65, there is a 50-50 chance that at least one spouse will live past age 92 and an appreciable chance they may live far longer (Figure 1). Prudence dictates that clients should not plan to averages. Many will be living to age 90 and well beyond.

    Longevity risk can be particularly challenging for two reasons. First, it amplifies other risks. The longer clients live in retirement, the longer they will be exposed to the risks of ongoing increases in healthcare costs, a serious healthcare event resulting in the need for long-term care services, inflation and market turbulence. Second, longevity may catch many clients by surprise. Retirees are far more likely to underestimate life expectancy (62%) than to overestimate it (19%). This may be because people commonly estimate their life expectancy based on how long their parents or other close relatives lived. Life expectancies have grown markedly from one generation to the next, so using relatives as a benchmark can lead people to underestimate their own life expectancy.

    Longevity-Risk_fig-2

     

    Addressing longevity risk

    While clients cannot eliminate longevity risk, Financial Advisors can help them mitigate the risk. Here are some practical steps advisors can take to help clients address concerns about their retirement finances:

    Make a retirement plan
    Clients nearing retirement can benefit from a well thought out retirement plan. Planning can offer direction and comfort to clients on track to retire, and guidance on how potentially to improve retirement prospects to those who are not. With a strategy in place, clients can make prudent decisions on such matters as when to retire, how much they can afford to spend, and when to start receiving Social Security. Many find that the very process of developing a retirement plan can offer a heightened sense of well being.

    The need for a retirement plan
    One of the greatest threats to a secure retirement is the failure to plan. Most retirees need income from their retirement savings to fund living expenses, making it crucial to have a sound plan. Yet, remarkably, only 44% of workers surveyed report that they or their spouse have tried to calculate how much money they will need to live comfortably in retirement. Planning is one area where Financial Advisors may add substantial value.

    Diversify and spend sustainably
    Having a well-diversified portfolio is important for retirees, as for other investors. But what is especially critical is a clear sense of just how much they can afford to spend, while allowing this spending to grow with inflation. Our research indicates that it is overly simplistic to recommend, as some do, a single spending rate for all retirees. Sustainable spending rates depend critically on a client’s age, gender and risk tolerance. Table 1 shows our estimates of sustainable spending levels for retirees seeking a moderate level of confidence (90%) that they will not outlive their wealth.

    For women retiring at age 65 the sustainable spending rate is 3.9%, very close to the four percent benchmark commonly used in the industry. But in general a 75-year-old can safely spend at a 5.2% rate, and a 55-year-old – who may have many more years to live – should spend at a more modest 3.2% rate.

    While it is well known that people today are living longer than ever before, few appreciate the magnitude and implications of this trend. For a couple, both age 65, there is a 50-50 chance that at least one spouse will live past age 92 and an appreciable chance they may live far longer

    Men, because they have shorter life expectancies, can in general safely spend a bit more than women of the same age. But couples, who should plan over the lifetimes of both spouses, should spend a bit less than singles.

    Finally, it is important for clients who may live another 20 years or more to view themselves as long term investors. This means keeping part of their portfolio in equities, which over the long term have outperformed fixed income investments. Holding a portfolio comprising only bonds and cash may feel “safe” to some retirees but, depending on market and interest rate conditions, can actually elevate their risk of outliving their money. The appropriate allocation to equities will depend on a client’s time horizon, risk tolerance, liquidity needs and specific investment objectives.

    Help clients carefully consider when to claim Social Security

    The choice of when to claim Social Security is among the most important financial decisions that clients will make. Recent Merrill Lynch research finds that the lifetime expected value of Social Security benefits can exceed $700,000 for many families and that waiting to claim Social Security can potentially boost clients’ expected lifetime benefits by as much as $60,000 to $150,000.

    People routinely claim Social Security when they retire, but many stand to benefit from separating the decision of when to retire from that of when to claim Social Security. So even if a client retires at age 62, it may make sense, if feasible, to wait until age 66 or beyond to claim benefits. For example a 56-year-old today, claiming at age 67 instead of age 62 will raise their monthly benefits by one third.

    Financial Advisors can add value by helping clients identify an opportune time to claim Social Security benefits, a determination that varies widely among retirees in different circumstances. Some guidelines to consider:

    • Those who (due to poor health or other reasons) have relatively short life expectancies should consider claiming benefits at 62, the earliest possible age.
    • Unmarried people whose life expectancy is average should consider waiting until age 69 or 70 to claim. Doing so boosts expected lifetime benefits by an estimated 14-18% as compared to claiming at age 62.
    • Many married couples stand to gain from coordinating when they claim benefits. Waiting until age 70 to claim can boost a couple’s expected lifetime benefit by over 20% as compared to both spouses claiming at age 62. Since individual circumstances differ, it may make sense for a non-working spouse to claim at 66, not 70.

    Allocate assets, where appropriate, to a lifetime income annuity

    In preparing for retirement, a key question for clients to consider is whether their guaranteed lifetime income from Social Security, pension and annuities will cover essential living expenses. If not, they should consider whether buying a lifetime income annuity may help them to close the gap. Suppose, for example, a client will be receiving annual pension and Social Security income totaling $40,000, but will need $50,000 to cover essential expenses. The client might consider an annuity that would pay, in regular installments, $10,000 per year for the rest of their life. Annuities are the only financial products available today that can offer a lifetime income regardless of how long a person lives.

    The advantages that annuities offer must be weighed against their relevant costs and risks. Variable annuities are subject to Mortality & Expense fees, surrender charges, market risk and credit risk. The funds used to purchase an immediate annuity usually cannot be accessed after the annuity is purchased except through its periodic payments. And buying an immediate annuity might come at the expense of not being able to leave a bequest from the funds used to make the purchase.

    What does research on annuities suggest? After studying hundreds of research articles on annuities, Professor Moshe Milevsky concluded that:

    Most financial, public and insurance economists would agree (something that is rare) that life annuities, longevity insurance and guaranteed pensions have an important role to play in the optimal retirement portfolio… [A]ll of these researchers agree that life annuities are a legitimate and core product for the optimal retirement portfolio.

    And a U.S. Government Accountability Office report notes:

    Experts we interviewed tended to recommend that retirees draw down their savings strategically and systematically and that they convert a portion of their savings into an income annuity to cover necessary expenses.

    Conclusion

    Many of your clients and prospects are concerned that they might outlive their wealth. You can help to alleviate these concerns by being their go-to guide on: retirement planning; spending and investing sustainably; claiming Social Security and lifetime income options. Helping clients with these concerns will help to solidify your position as their trusted advisor. ◊

    – See more at: http://www.lifehealth.com/planning-today-getting-there-and-getting-through/#sthash.KXfGVcir.dpuf

     

    Mr. Laster is Head of Retirement Strategies for Bank of America Merrill Lynch. Connect with him by e-mail: David.Laster@ml.com

     

    Originally Posted on November 2, 2015 by David Laster.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency