We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,343)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (427)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (809)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (276)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Annuity Providers Fight New Investment Rule

    June 9, 2016 by David Lee

    DALLAS (CN) – The Labor Department’s rule change that imposes fiduciary duties on financial advisors is arbitrary and unconstitutionally infringes on “protected commercial speech,” according to several insurance groups that sell annuities.
         Lead plaintiff American Council of Life Insurers sued the government in Federal Court on Wednesday, arguing the April rule change is “arbitrary and capricious” and is against the law.
         The annuity firms say the rule hurts retirees who “more than ever need access to guaranteed lifetime income products,” such as annuities. The lawsuit cites a White House task force that said in 2010 there is a “compelling need” to promote annuities and other forms of lifetime guaranteed income.
         “The rule promulgated by the department, however, will injure American consumers by restricting, limiting, or denying them access to information about guaranteed lifetime income products,” the 105-page complaint states. “By imposing a vague and burdensome fiduciary standard on non-fiduciary sales relationships, the rule will upend the retirement savings marketplace and seriously threaten consumers’ access to guaranteed lifetime income products.”
         The plaintiffs argue Congress only gave the agency authority to regulate “fiduciary” advice. They say that selling life insurance products has “never before been deemed fiduciary and do not bear the hallmarks of fiduciary duties.”
         The government was hit with a similar lawsuit last week by several trade and business groups. That complaint claims the rule change will hurt retirement savers and “creates sweeping changes” that make saving harder.
         “It specifically hinders many of our member firms’ ability to continue providing the level of holistic financial advice and suitable investment options their clients are accustomed to,” the June 1 complaint stated. “The rule will shackle Main Street financial advisors with extensive new requirements and constant liability, forcing them to limit the options and guidance they provide to retirement savers.”
         Labor Department officials declined to comment on the insurers’ lawsuit Thursday afternoon, but responded to last week’s lawsuit by saying the rule change was “one of the most deliberate, open regulatory processes in recent memory.”
         “Conflicted advice is eroding the savings of working Americans to the tune of $17 billion each year,” U.S. Secretary of Labor Thomas E. Perez said on June 2. “The conflict of interest rule aims to address that problem by requiring retirement advisors to look out for the best interests of their clients. Many financial services professionals, from small town advisers to some of the nation’s largest firms, engaged constructively with the department throughout the rulemaking process and, after publication of the final rule, noted that they do put the interests of their clients first and are well positioned to comply … But there is a small, vocal minority who support the status quo that enables them to put their own interests first. This lawsuit seeks to vindicate their desire to put their own interests ahead of their clients’ best interests.”
         Perez said the rule change is “built upon solid statutory and legal foundations” and that the agency will “vigorously” defend it.
         Co-plaintiffs in the June 8 lawsuit include the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors and its offices Amarillo, Dallas, Fort Worth and Wichita Falls.
         The companies seek a declaration against the rule for violations of the Administrative Procedure Act and the First Amendment. They are represented by David W. Ogden with Wilmer Cutler in Washington, D.C. 

    Originally Posted at Courthouse News Service on June 9, 2016 by David Lee.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency