We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,343)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (427)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (809)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (276)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • FIDUCIARY RULE OPPONENTS TAKE THEIR FIGHT TO THE COURTS

    June 21, 2016 by ANDREA L. BEN-YOSEF

    Even though the fiduciary rule was released in April, opponents are still continuing their attack, this time through the courts.

    In early June, five different lawsuits were filed against the Department of Labor. They make some allegations that are similar and some that are different. The complaints pull in several federal statutes and the U.S. Constitution, alleging violations of the Administrative Procedure Act, the Regulatory Flexibility Act, the Dodd-Frank Act, the Federal Arbitration Act and violations of the First and Fifth Amendments.

    One thing every complaint has in common is the issue of fixed index annuities. These annuities are linked to a market index, and are more risky than fixed annuities (but with a potentially higher rate of return) but less risky than variable annuities. The DOL’s rule provides that fixed index annuities come under the best interest contract exemption (BICE), surprising many who thought they would stay under a more lenient standard.

    The BICE requires that parties adhere to certain standards of conduct and create a contract with the investor. Generally, financial institutions and advisers must give prudent advice that is in the customer’s best interest, avoid misleading statements about investment transactions, compensation and conflicts of interest, and receive no more than reasonable compensation. Under the final rule, advisers selling fixed index annuities must comply with the new requirements beginning in April 2017.

    It is too early to tell which, if any of these claims, will get any traction in the courts. The five lawsuits, with their specific allegations, are listed below:

    Chamber of Commerce v. Perez, N.D. Texas, alleges, among other things, that the DOL exceeded its authority under ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code, and the APA; unlawfully created a private right of action for IRA and other non-ERISA plan participants to sue financial institutions; failed to provide adequate notice and consideration of comments; violated the Federal Arbitration Act by not allowing reliance on the BICE if a financial institution includes an arbitration agreement with a class action waiver in their contract with customers; failed to allow the public to comment on the regulation of fixed index annuities; and violated the First Amendment by imposing the BICE on communications between financial advisers and their clients.

    American Council of Life Insurers v. Perez, N.D. Texas, alleges, among other things, that the fiduciary rule imposes fiduciary duties on non-fiduciary communications; the BICE violates the APA by creating private rights and remedies not authorized by Congress; the rule arbitrarily disfavors fixed index annuities; and the rule violates the First Amendment as applied to truthful, non-misleading commercial speech about retirement by non-fiduciary salespersons.

    Indexed Annuity Leadership Council v. Perez, N.D. Texas, alleges that, among other things, the DOL violated the APA and exceeded its statutory authority by expanding the definition of fiduciary to include sellers of fixed index annuities; unlawfully created a private cause of action under the BICE; acted arbitrarily in making a distinction between fixed index annuities and other annuities; failed to give proper notice of revoking the BICE for fixed indexed annuities; and violated the First Amendment by severely burdening commercial speech between sellers of fixed income annuities and consumers.

    The National Association for Fixed Annuities v. Perez, D. D.C., alleges, among other things, that the DOL violated the APA by imposing ERISA fiduciary duties on IRAs; unlawfully created a private right of action through the BICE; violated the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment by its “vague” references to “reasonable compensation”; violated the Dodd-Frank Act by treating fixed indexed annuities as securities and thus including them in the BICE; and violated the Regulatory Flexibility Act by failing to consider the rule’s impact on small businesses.

    Market Synergy Group Inc. v. Perez, D. Kan., alleges that, among other things, the DOL violated the APA by failing to give the public adequate notice that it might include fixed index annuities in the BICE; and violated the APA and the Regulatory Flexibility Act by failing to consider the economic impact on including fixed index annuities in the BICE.

     

    Originally Posted at Bloomberg BNA on June 17, 2016 by ANDREA L. BEN-YOSEF.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency