We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,343)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (427)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (809)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (276)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Insurance groups sue Labor Department over fiduciary rule’s impact on annuities

    June 9, 2016 by Mark Schoeff Jr

    Insurance groups filed a lawsuit Wednesday against a U.S. Labor Department rule that would raise investment advice standards for retirement accounts, arguing that the regulation would stifle annuity sales.

    The American Council of Life Insurers, the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors and six NAIFA chapters in Texas brought the claim in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas.

    The 105-page suit is the third in the last week designed to kill the DOL regulation, which would require financial advisers to act in the best interests of their clients in 401(k)s, individual retirement accounts and other qualified accounts.

    In a six-count claim, the insurance groups argue that the DOL does not have the authority to promulgate the rule, which it deemed “arbitrary, capricious … and unconstitutional.”

    Similar language was used in the other two lawsuits.

    And this suit is being filed in the same Texas court as the claim last week brought by several financial and business trade organizations, including the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association and the Financial Services Institute. Both claims are trying to increase their chances of success by using a court that has ruled against other DOL regulations over the last year.

    This suit argues that the measure would deprive savers of access to products, such as variable and fixed-indexed annuities, that give them an income stream in retirement.

    “The rule will drive up the costs of those valuable guaranteed lifetime income products, artificially distort the marketplace for retirement products generally, interfere with the free flow of valuable commercial information about those products to American consumers, and thereby worsen, not help resolve, the profound challenges facing retirement investors,” the claim states.

    It added: “The rule is arbitrary, capricious and contrary to law as applied to the annuity products issued, marketed or sold by plaintiffs’ members, because the (Labor) Department failed reasonably to assess and evaluate the profound adverse effects and minimal real-world benefits of its approach.”

    The plaintiffs are asking the court to vacate the rule and prevent the DOL from enforcing it.

    A DOL spokesman was not immediately available for comment.

    But in response to the suit filed last week by several financial and business groups, Labor Secretary Thomas Perez vowed to vigorously defend the rule, which he says protects workers and retirees from investment advice touting high-fee products that enrich the adviser to the detriment of clients’ retirement savings.

    A Washington, D.C., district court will hear in late August a separate suit against the rule filed by the National Association of Fixed Annuities.

    Mark Schoeff Jr. writes for Pensions & Investments, a sister publication of Business Insurance.

    Originally Posted at Business Insider on June 9, 2016 by Mark Schoeff Jr.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency