We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‚ÄėContact Us‚Äô link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (14,193)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (2)
  • Negative Media (128)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (538)
  • Sheryl's Blogs (152)
  • Wink's Articles (208)
  • Wink's Blogs (183)
  • Wink's Press Releases (83)
  • Blog Archives

  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • Thrivent Fights DOL Fiduciary Rule‚Äôs Anti-Arb Clause

    August 23, 2017 by Melanie Waddell

    Thrivent Financial for Lutherans, the insurer suing the Department of Labor over its fiduciary rule, said Monday that it plans to file a preliminary injunction soon to halt the anti-arbitration clause set out in the rule’s best-interest contract exemption.

    In a¬†Monday letter¬†to Judge Susan Richard Nelson in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota, the lead attorney for Thrivent, Andrew Kay, said that due to Labor‚Äôs refusal to address Thrivent‚Äôs concerns about ‚Äúthe anti-arbitration condition that remains part of the [best-interest contract exemption]‚ÄĚ to the fiduciary rule, Thrivent intends to ‚Äúfile soon‚ÄĚ a motion for preliminary injunction.

    Click HERE to read the original story via ThinkAdvisor.

    Thrivent became the sixth plaintiff to lob a complaint against Labor’s fiduciary rule when the insurer filed a suit last September challenging the class-action waiver requirement under the rule’s best-interest contract exemption, or BICE.

    Compliance with BICE is set to kick in on Jan. 1, 2018, but Labor Secretary Alexander Acosta told the same court on Aug. 9 that Labor had filed with the Office of Management and Budget to have the January compliance date extended by 18 months.

    Thrivent’s case against Labor’s rule has been focused specifically on the arbitration portion of the BICE, so any preliminary injunction motion would necessarily focus on that specifically as well.

    Thrivent, Kay said in the letter, took issue with Labor‚Äôs position to only address issuing a ‚Äúpublic statement that it does not intend to enforce the anti-arbitration condition of the BIC Exemption.‚ÄĚ

    Such a public statement, Kay said, would not address Thrivent’s concerns for several reasons:

    First, he said, “a statement of non-enforcement would not change the fact that the regulation remains on the books, making it impossible for Thrivent to make required certifications of its regulatory compliance, including required certifications to state regulators that Thrivent complies with all federal laws.”

    Second, the fiduciary rule and related exemptions are to be enforced in part through excise taxes collected by the Treasury Department, Kay wrote.

    ‚ÄúDOL does not have any enforcement authority. Unlike eliminating the rule or enjoining its enforcement, DOL‚Äôs statement of nonenforcement provides no guarantee that the Department of Treasury (a separate federal agency) would refrain from enforcing the rule once in effect.‚ÄĚ

    Third, Kay argued, under the existing structure, ‚Äúit is private litigants ‚ÄĒ not federal agencies ‚ÄĒ who would primarily enforce the fiduciary rule. DOL‚Äôs proposed statement of non-enforcement would not guarantee that private litigants would refrain from pursuing putative class actions and citing existing provisions of the BIC Exemption, which were duly promulgated under the Administrative Procedures Act, in support of that effort.‚ÄĚ

    Thrivent, Kay continued, ‚Äúwould be willing to have its motion for a preliminary injunction considered based on the papers and without a hearing, and Thrivent would request a briefing schedule that would allow briefing to be completed by the third week in September.‚ÄĚ

    If the court wishes to hold a hearing, Thrivent would request to be heard on its motion sometime during late September or early October, Kay stated.

    In the filing with the court in the case being brought against Labor by Thrivent Financial for Lutherans, Acosta told the court that Labor submitted to OMB proposed amendments to three exemptions:

    • The best-interest contract exemption, which opponents of the rule argued is the contract that would spark a slew of class-action lawsuits;
    • Class exemption for principal transactions in certain assets between investment advice fiduciaries and employee benefit plans and IRAs;¬†and
    • Prohibited Transaction Exemption 84-24¬†for certain transactions involving insurance agents and brokers, pension consultants, insurance companies, and investment company principal underwriters.

    OMB has 90 days to review Labor’s request to extend the compliance deadline. Once approved, Labor’s proposal will be published in the Federal Register and public comments will be taken, likely for 15 days.

    Originally Posted at ThinkAdvisor on August 22, 2017 by Melanie Waddell.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency