We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,244)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (422)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (804)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • New York proposes best interest standard to apply to annuity and life insurance sales

    December 29, 2017 by Greensfelder Hemker & Gale PC

    New York Department of Financial Services Superintendent Maria Vullo released a proposed revision to New York’s annuity suitability rule that would apply a best interest standard to all annuity and life insurance recommendations in New York.

    A recommendation is in the best interest of a consumer if it is in furtherance of the consumer’s needs and objectives and is made “without regard to the financial or other interests of the producer, insurer, or any other party,” according to the proposal.

    The New York proposal goes further than a recent draft revision to the model suitability regulation published by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners that would subject annuity purchases to a best interest standard. The New York proposal applies not just to annuities but also to life insurance sales.

    The two drafts also define best interest differently. The NAIC draft speaks in terms of “acting with reasonable diligence, care, skill and prudence,” similar to New York, it also specifies that best interest does not mean the least expensive annuity or that the annuity offers the highest interest rate or highest payout. Similarly, best interest does not mean the annuity is the single best annuity available at the time of the sale. The NAIC draft also defines best interest in terms of putting the interest of the consumer “first and foremost” rather than in terms of ignoring the producer’s compensation.

    The press release announcing New York’s proposal tied it to the Department of Labor fiduciary rule, quoting New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo as saying, “As Washington continues to ignore and roll back efforts to protect Americans, New York will continue to use its role as a strong regulator of the financial services and insurance industries to fight for consumers and help ensure a level playing field.”

    The New York proposal covers both more and less ground than the DOL fiduciary rule. Unlike the DOL rule, the New York proposal would cover recommendations outside of retirement accounts. On the other hand, it does not apply to recommendations to buy or sell mutual funds or other securities (except, perhaps, to the extent a recommendation to sell is tied to a recommendation to purchase an annuity or life insurance product).

    According to the proposal, one acts in the best interest of the consumer when “the producer’s or insurer’s recommendations to the consumer are based on an evaluation of the suitability information of the consumer that reflects the care, skill, prudence, and diligence that a prudent person familiar with such matters would use under the circumstances without regard to the financial or other interests of the producer, insurer, or other party,” when the transaction is suitable, and when certain other requirements that largely currently exist under New York law have been satisfied.

    The proposal also specifies that producers not “state or imply” that the recommendation to purchase an annuity or a life insurance product “is part of financial planning, financial advice, investment management or related services unless the producer has a specific certification or professional designation in that area.” The revised rule would also apply to any producer involved in the transaction, even if he or she never met with the consumer.

    Responding to another trend in the financial services industry, the New York proposal also includes a new provision regarding the prevention of financial exploitation: “An insurer shall establish and maintain procedures designed to prevent financial exploitation and abuse.”

    The comment period on the proposal expires Feb. 26, 2018.

    Originally Posted at Lexology on December 28, 2017 by Greensfelder Hemker & Gale PC.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency