We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!


media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us


Close [x]

Industry News


  • Industry Articles (21,038)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (34)
  • Moore on the Market (408)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (797)
  • Wink's Articles (346)
  • Wink's Inside Story (272)
  • Wink's Press Releases (121)
  • Blog Archives

  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • Future-Proofing the U.S. Retirement System Requires Addressing Demographic Disparities

    December 20, 2022 by Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies

    New report examines demographic influences and vulnerable populations in the U.S. workforce

    LOS ANGELESDec. 16, 2022 /PRNewswire/ — Almost half of U.S. workers (49 percent) expect their primary source of retirement income to come from self-funded savings such as 401(k)s, 403(b)s, IRAs, and other savings and investments. However, the total household retirement savings among workers is only $67,000 (estimated median), according to Emerging From the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Compendium About U.S. Workers’ Retirement Outlook (“Compendium”), a comprehensive study released today by nonprofit Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies® (TCRS) in collaboration with Transamerica Institute®.

    “Amid concerns about Social Security, the disappearance of traditional defined benefit pensions, and intensifying expectations that workers self-fund a greater portion of their retirement income, many workers are inadequately saving and are at risk of not achieving a financially secure retirement,” said Catherine Collinson, CEO and president of Transamerica Institute and TCRS. “Enhancing retirement security involves addressing demographic disparities, removing structural barriers, and future-proofing the system so everyone can retire with dignity.”

    As part of TCRS’ 22nd Annual Retirement Survey of Workersthe Compendium is based on a survey of employed workers at for-profit companies conducted in late 2021. It offers more than 35 key retirement indicators by household income, employment status (full-time, part-time), level of educational attainment, urbanicity, caregiver status, LGBTQ+ status, and race/ethnicity.

    Lower-Income Workers Have Less Ability to Save for Retirement

    “Lower-income workers have less money and fewer opportunities to save for retirement in the workplace,” said Collinson. Sixty-seven percent of workers with a household income (HHI) of less than $50,000 feel they do not have enough income to save for retirement.

    Only 60 percent of workers with an HHI of less than $50,000 are offered a 401(k) or similar plan by their employer, and 58 percent of them participate. In comparison, 74 percent of workers with an HHI of $50,000 to $99,999 are offered a plan, and 76 percent participate, while 78 percent of workers with an HHI of $100,000+ are offered a plan, and 85 percent participate.

    Retirement savings increase dramatically with household income. Workers with an HHI of less than $50,000 have saved just $3,000 in total household retirement accounts while workers with an HHI of $50,000 to $99,000 have saved $42,000, and those with an HHI of $100,000+ have saved $172,000 (estimated medians).

    Forty-eight percent of workers with an HHI of less than $50,000 expect to retire at age 70 or older or do not plan to retire. Thirty-five percent expect Social Security to be their primary source of retirement income.

    The Saver’s Credit is a tax credit to incentivize savings among low- to moderate-income workers who save for retirement in a 401(k) or similar plan or IRA. Unfortunately, fewer than half of workers who may meet the income eligibility requirements are aware of it.

    Part-Time Workers Have Less Access to Employer-Sponsored Retirement Benefits

    “With lower pay and less access to employer-sponsored benefits, part-time workers are at a disadvantage in saving for retirement, compared with full-time workers,” said Collinson. Only 19 percent of part-time workers “strongly” agree they are building a large enough retirement nest egg.

    Slightly more than half of part-time workers (51 percent) are offered a 401(k) or similar plan by their employer, and 59 percent of them participate. In comparison, 77 percent of full-time workers are offered a plan, and 80 percent of them participate.

    Part-time workers have saved just $29,000 in total household retirement accounts, while full-time workers have saved $74,000 (estimated medians).

    Forty-eight percent of part-time workers expect to retire at age 70 or older or do not plan to retire. Twenty-nine percent expect Social Security to be their primary source of retirement income.

    Educational Attainment Inspires Retirement Confidence

    “Educational attainment brings career opportunities, higher pay, and better employer benefits which translate to improved retirement confidence,” said Collinson. Among those age 25 and older, workers with a college degree are twice as likely as those without a degree to be “very” confident in their ability to fully retire with a comfortable lifestyle (35 percent, 17 percent, respectively).

    Eighty-two percent of workers with a college degree are offered a 401(k) or similar plan by their employer, and 87 percent of them participate. In comparison, only 67 percent of workers without a college degree are offered a plan, and just 74 percent participate.

    Workers without a college degree have saved $32,000 in total household retirement accounts, which is dramatically less than the $170,000 saved by workers with a college degree (estimated medians).

    Forty-two percent of workers without a college degree expect to retire at age 70 or older or do not plan to retire. Thirty-two percent expect Social Security to be their primary source of retirement income.

    Rural Workers Are Getting Left Behind

    “In recent decades, economic activity in the U.S. has become increasingly concentrated in urban and suburban areas. As a result, rural workers are getting left behind regarding employment opportunities and retirement preparations,” said Collinson.

    Rural workers have lower household incomes than suburban and urban workers ($65,000$88,000$90,000, respectively) (estimated medians).

    Only 66 percent of rural workers are offered a 401(k) or similar plan by their employer, and 72 percent of them participate. In comparison, 74 percent of both urban and suburban workers are offered a plan, and approximately eight in 10 participate (77 percent, 80 percent, respectively).

    Rural workers have saved $33,000 in total household retirement accounts, while urban workers have saved $67,000 and suburban workers have saved $82,000 (estimated medians).

    Forty-five percent of rural workers expect to retire at age 70 or older or do not plan to retire. Thirty percent expect Social Security to be their primary source of retirement income.

    Caregiving Is a Potential Threat to Retirement Security

    “With the skyrocketing costs of long-term care services and supports, many workers will be called upon to be an unpaid caregiver for an aging parent or loved one. This labor of love often involves trade-offs in a worker’s employment and financial situation which could compromise their future retirement,” said Collinson.

    Almost four in 10 workers (38 percent) currently serve as caregivers or have been a caregiver in the past. In doing so, 85 percent have made one or more adjustments to their employment situation, ranging from missing days of work and reducing hours to foregoing a promotion or quitting a job.

    Caregiving workers, including current and past caregivers, are more likely than non-caregivers (i.e., those who have never served as a caregiver) to have experienced one or more negative impacts to their employment during the pandemic (50 percent, 30 percent, respectively). Caregiving workers are also more likely to indicate their financial situation has worsened as a result of the pandemic (28 percent, 19 percent).

    Despite their challenges, caregiving workers are faring slightly better than non-caregivers in retirement savings. Seventy-eight percent of caregivers are offered a 401(k) or similar plan by their employer, and 82 percent of them participate. Only 70 percent of non-caregivers are offered a plan, and 74 percent participate.

    Caregiving workers have saved $70,000 in total household retirement accounts while non-caregivers have saved $64,000 (estimated medians).

    A Potentially Brighter Retirement Future for LGBTQ+ Workers

    “Historically, the LGBTQ+ community has been a demographic segment more likely to retire in poverty. However, in recent decades, the LGBTQ+ community has made great progress with the enactment of legal protections and recognition of rights. Importantly, the legalization of same-sex marriage makes same-sex spouses eligible for government and employer-sponsored retirement benefits,” said Collinson. “Today’s LGBTQ+ workers have a brighter retirement future.”

    Many LGBTQ+ workers are early in their careers and getting started with retirement savings. Survey respondents self-identifying as LGBTQ+ workers are younger than non-LGBTQ+ workers (age 32, age 41, respectively) (medians). Twenty-five percent of LGBTQ+ workers are between ages 18 and 24, compared with nine percent of non-LGBTQ+ workers.

    Sixty-seven percent of LGBTQ+ workers are offered a 401(k) or similar plan by their employer, and 77 percent of them participate. Seventy-three percent of non-LGBTQ+ workers are offered a plan, and 78 percent participate.

    LGBTQ+ workers have saved $31,000 in total household retirement accounts, while non-LGBTQ+ workers have saved $70,000 (estimated medians).

    Forty-four percent of LGBTQ+ workers expect to retire at age 70 or older or do not plan to retire.

    Influences of Race and Ethnicity on Retirement Savings

    “Our societal focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion has solidified the imperative for bridging racial inequalities,” said Collinson. “The survey findings reflect the dynamic nature of the workforce, highlight retirement-related similarities and differences, and surface questions for further research.”

    The workforce is becoming more diverse, especially among younger generations, a trend that is reflected in workers’ ages across race and ethnicity. Among the survey respondents, white workers are older than Asian American/Pacific Islander (AAPI), Black/African American, and Hispanic workers (age 44, age 40, age 34, age 34, respectively) (medians).

    Contextually, a worker’s age and household income are major contributing factors to their retirement savings. AAPI workers report the highest household income at $100,000, followed by White ($92,000), Hispanic ($70,000), and Black workers ($59,000) (estimated medians).

    Black workers are more likely than AAPI, Hispanic, and White workers to be offered a 401(k) or similar plan by their employer (80 percent, 76 percent, 73 percent, 71 percent, respectively). However, among those offered a plan, Black workers are less likely than other races/ethnicities to participate in the plan (65 percent, 78 percent, 79 percent, 80 percent).

    AAPI workers have saved the most in total household retirement accounts, followed by White, Hispanic, and Black workers ($105,000$86,000$45,000 $34,000, respectively) (estimated medians).

    “Strengthening the U.S. retirement system requires expanding retirement plan coverage, making it affordable for employers to offer benefits and easy for workers to save in the workplace, and ensuring workers of all ages have meaningful employment, income, and incentives to save. It also requires implementing reforms to address Social Security’s funding shortfalls and strengthening safety nets,” said Collinson. “Success can be best achieved by a collaboration among policymakers, industry, academics, nonprofits, employers, and individuals. Every stakeholder plays a vital role in transforming the future.”

    The Compendium is the sixth report from TCRS’ 22nd Annual Retirement Survey with other reports featuring analysis about employment situationthe employer’s perspective and employer sizegenerations and agegender, and the Saver’s Credit. Visit transamericainstitute.org to view the Compendium and other reports. Follow TCRS on Twitter and Transamerica Institute on LinkedInTwitter, and Facebook.

    A b o u t Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies

    Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies® (TCRS) is a division of Transamerica Institute®, a nonprofit, private foundation. Transamerica Institute is funded by contributions from Transamerica Life Insurance Company and its affiliates. TCRS and its representatives cannot give ERISA, tax, investment, or legal advice. This material is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as ERISA, tax, investment, or legal advice. Interested parties must consult and rely solely upon their independent advisors regarding their situation and the concepts presented here. For more information, visit  www.transamericainstitute.org and follow TCRS on Twitter at @TCRStudies.

    About the 22nd Annual Transamerica Retirement Survey

    The analysis contained in Emerging From the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Compendium About U.S. Workers’ Retirement Outlook was prepared by the research teams at Transamerica Institute, TCRS, and The Harris Poll. The 28-minute online survey was conducted within the U.S. by The Harris Poll on behalf of Transamerica Institute and TCRS between October 28 and December 10, 2021 among a nationally representative sample of 5,493 workers in a for-profit company employing one or more employees. Results were weighted where necessary to align with the population of U.S. residents, referencing Census data for education, age by gender, race/ethnicity, region, household income, education, employment, marital status, and size of household. Weighting also adjusts for attitudinal and behavioral differences between those who are online versus those who are not, those who join online panels versus those who do not, and those who respond to surveys versus those who do not.

    Media Contact: Morgan Karbowski



    SOURCE Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies

    Originally Posted at CISION PRNewswire on December 16, 2022 by Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies.

    Categories: Industry Articles