We would love to hear from you. Click on the ‘Contact Us’ link to the right and choose your favorite way to reach-out!

wscdsdc

media/speaking contact

Jamie Johnson

business contact

Victoria Peterson

Contact Us

855.ask.wink

Close [x]
pattern

Industry News

Categories

  • Industry Articles (21,311)
  • Industry Conferences (2)
  • Industry Job Openings (35)
  • Moore on the Market (425)
  • Negative Media (144)
  • Positive Media (73)
  • Sheryl's Articles (806)
  • Wink's Articles (354)
  • Wink's Inside Story (275)
  • Wink's Press Releases (123)
  • Blog Archives

  • May 2024
  • April 2024
  • March 2024
  • February 2024
  • January 2024
  • December 2023
  • November 2023
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • August 2023
  • July 2023
  • June 2023
  • May 2023
  • April 2023
  • March 2023
  • February 2023
  • January 2023
  • December 2022
  • November 2022
  • October 2022
  • September 2022
  • August 2022
  • July 2022
  • June 2022
  • May 2022
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • November 2021
  • October 2021
  • September 2021
  • August 2021
  • July 2021
  • June 2021
  • May 2021
  • April 2021
  • March 2021
  • February 2021
  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • September 2020
  • August 2020
  • July 2020
  • June 2020
  • May 2020
  • April 2020
  • March 2020
  • February 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • August 2019
  • July 2019
  • June 2019
  • May 2019
  • April 2019
  • March 2019
  • February 2019
  • January 2019
  • December 2018
  • November 2018
  • October 2018
  • September 2018
  • August 2018
  • July 2018
  • June 2018
  • May 2018
  • April 2018
  • March 2018
  • February 2018
  • January 2018
  • December 2017
  • November 2017
  • October 2017
  • September 2017
  • August 2017
  • July 2017
  • June 2017
  • May 2017
  • April 2017
  • March 2017
  • February 2017
  • January 2017
  • December 2016
  • November 2016
  • October 2016
  • September 2016
  • August 2016
  • July 2016
  • June 2016
  • May 2016
  • April 2016
  • March 2016
  • February 2016
  • January 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • October 2015
  • September 2015
  • August 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • April 2015
  • March 2015
  • February 2015
  • January 2015
  • December 2014
  • November 2014
  • October 2014
  • September 2014
  • August 2014
  • July 2014
  • June 2014
  • May 2014
  • April 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013
  • June 2013
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • August 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • November 2008
  • September 2008
  • May 2008
  • February 2008
  • August 2006
  • NISA Unveils Key Insights for Fiduciaries in Partial Annuity Buyout Transactions

    October 31, 2023 by NISA


    • Partial annuity buyout transactions inherently pit two groups of participants against one another: (1) those in the transaction and (2) those remaining within the plan. 
    • NISA uses standard bond math to assist fiduciaries in quantifying the economic cost to each group.
    • Results underscore the importance of fiduciaries considering the “safest available” provider, as measured by NISA’s Economic Loss to Beneficiaries (ELB)SM calculation.

    ST. LOUISOct. 26, 2023 /PRNewswire/ — NISA Investment Advisors, LLC (“NISA”) released a new and intuitive economic model that sheds light on the dynamics of Pension Risk Transfers (PRTs), particularly partial annuity buyout transactions and the crucial role of fiduciaries in balancing pension plan participants’ interests.

    In a world where partial annuity buyout transactions inherently pit two groups of plan participants against each other—the participants in the transaction and those remaining within the plan—NISA employs standard bond math to quantify the economic cost to each group. The results underscore the paramount importance of fiduciaries considering the “safest available” provider, as measured by NISA’s Economic Loss to Beneficiaries (ELB)SM calculation.

     

    Key Findings:

    • NISA’s research reveals that, in nearly all scenarios, fiduciaries seeking to balance the interests of participants should opt for the “safest available” provider, as measured by NISA’s ELB measure.
    • NISA’s October 2022 analysis titled “Pension Risk Transfers May Be Transferring Risk to Beneficiaries” highlighted the significant credit quality variations among typical PRT providers, as measured by the bond market and the corresponding economic loss to beneficiaries (ELB). The ELB represents the negative externality that impacts plan participants when fiduciaries choose a lower-quality credit PRT provider over the “safest available.”
    • In its latest analysis, “Who Reaps the Benefit of Competitive PRT Pricing? A Simple Economic Model,” NISA leverages the ELB framework to assist fiduciaries in making informed decisions. This most recent analysis demonstrates why solely selecting the lowest-cost provider may not adequately balance the interests of all stakeholders.

    NISA demonstrates that the two participant groups’ interests are equitable when the following equation holds:

    Bond Spread Difference Between Insurers = % Difference Between Insurers * Sponsor’s Bond Spread

    If the left-hand side of the equation is greater than the right-hand side, choosing the lower quality, lower cost insurer harms the transferred participants more than the remaining participants—and vice versa if the right-hand side is greater than the left.

    David G. Eichhorn, NISA’s CEO and Head of Investment Strategies, noted, “Our framework provides fiduciaries with a quantitative, market-based way to balance the competing interests of different participant groups. But perhaps the most valuable conclusion from the analysis is the identification of the extreme inelasticity in the relationship between insurer credit quality and the required transaction discount to choose a lower-quality insurer. In all but extreme situations, selecting the highest quality insurer, irrespective of price, will be the prudent decision.”

    Please visit our website by clicking here to view additional articles and supporting data regarding PRTs and their impact on beneficiaries.

    About NISA Investment Advisors, LLC

    NISA Investment Advisors, LLC is a registered investment adviser, and manages assets for some of the largest institutional investors in the U.S. NISA is 100% employee-owned and based in St. Louis, Missouri. Client portfolios include investment-grade fixed income, derivative overlay and equity investments. As of September 30, 2023, NISA managed $249 billion in physical assets and $220 billion in derivative notional value in separate account portfolios. $18.3 billion in Repurchase Agreement notional and underlying assets are reported in both physical assets and derivatives notional value under management.

    For more information, visit www.nisa.com and see us on LinkedIn.

    Contact: 

    Michael Herley for NISA Investment Advisors, LLC

    michael.herley@southportpr.com or 203-308-1409

    SOURCE NISA Investment Advisors, LLC

    Originally Posted at Cision PR Newswire on October 26, 2023 by NISA.

    Categories: Industry Articles
    currency